Jury still out on robo-advice

robo-advice fintech financial advice

8 March 2016
| By Malavika |
image
image
expand image

The jury is still out on whether robo-advice groups can generate revenue and build businesses around the model, because acquiring customers is expensive and creating a revenue model is difficult, according to an academic.

Melbourne Business School principal fellow, Dr Sam Wylie, opined that acquiring customers who wished to have their wealth designed and implemented was difficult while convincing them to pay for that service was almost impossible.

He likened it to peer-to-peer lending, which while he acknowledged carried potential, he noted that nobody had implemented it at scale and generated revenue.

"There's a hell of a lot of talk about peer-to-peer lending but when you dig into it, you'll usually see that money is being lent in tens of millions of dollars and nobody's actually making a profit yet. I put robo-advice in that category," Wylie said.

While there was an argument that robo-advice could provide financial advice access to the generation Y cohort and 80 per cent of those who did not seek advice, it was not necessarily money or inconvenience that was preventing them from seeking advice.

Rather it was because they either did not feel they needed financial advice or they just were not engaged with their finances.

"Just because you put an online solution in front of them, doesn't mean that that's going to activate anything," he said.

Wylie noted Macquarie's robo advisory service, Owners Advisory, was a diagnostic approach, wherein they targeted high-net worth investors who were already invested and sought to advise them on whether they had the appropriate solutions and the best implementation.

"It might be really about building Macquarie's brand and ultimately not making money out of the service but making money out of convincing people that they really should have all of their money with Macquarie: that they should let Macquarie manage their money," he said.

While he acknowledged that robo advice would ultimately take over financial advice in the long-term, he said robo-advice was just an additional product that differentiated one advisory group from another in the near-term, with little prospect of generating substantial revenue at present.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

 

Recommended for you

 

MARKET INSIGHTS

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

Chris Cornish

By having trustees supervise client directed payments from their pension funds, Stephen Jones and the federal Labor gove...

1 day 8 hours ago
Chris Cornish

Now we now the size of Stephen Jones' CSOLR tax, I doubt anyone will be employer any new financial adviser from this poi...

1 day 8 hours ago
JOHN GILLIES

Amazing ! Between the beginning of licencing Feb 2002 and 2008 this was a very good stable industry.Then the do-gooders...

2 days 3 hours ago

AustralianSuper and Australian Retirement Trust have posted the financial results for the 2022–23 financial year for their combined 5.3 million members....

10 months 1 week ago

A $34 billion fund has come out on top with a 13.3 per cent return in the last 12 months, beating out mega funds like Australian Retirement Trust and Aware Super. ...

10 months ago

The verdict in the class action case against AMP Financial Planning has been delivered in the Federal Court by Justice Moshinsky....

10 months 1 week ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND