ISA backs Royal Commission into banks

11 April 2016
| By Malavika |
image
image
expand image

Industry Super Australia has backed calls for a Royal Commission into Australian banks, even as other associations and lobby groups rejected the idea.

ISA argued lack of trust in banks after recent scandals and allegations of wrong-doing could shake public confidence in their lines of business in compulsory superannuation.

"Despite this, we have seen the banks consistently seek to design policy to suit their vertically integrated business models, typically at the expense of the Australia public," ISA said in a statement.

The banks have lobbied to protect sales commission for selling life insurance, change the governance model of not-for-profit super funds, remove protections for those who do not choose their own super funds, it said.

But the Financial Services Council (FSC) said a Royal Commission into the sector would be a waste of time and resources, given the industry has been subject to 14 inquiries into the superannuation, financial advice and life insurance sectors, and the fact that Australia is looking to transition away from the resources economy to a services-driven economy.

"Some of these have led to legislation, increased regulation and better consumer protections and outcomes," FSC chief executive, Sally Loane said.

"Where poor practices have been identified the financial services industry has led reviews to understand where consumers were affected and put legislation in place to permanently address shortcomings."

The Australian Bankers' Association (ABA) has warned a Royal Commission would send "alarm signals" to international investors, particularly during a period of global volatility.

It also echoed the FSC's stance, arguing that the issues raised by the Labor Party have already been addressed in inquiries, and before Parliament, with new regulations introduced for banks.

"The outcomes of those inquiries are either being implemented or, like the former Government's Future of Financial Advice reforms, are still taking full effect, ABA chief executive, Steven Münchenberg said.

"These measures respond to instances that occurred in the past and should be given a chance to take full effect before another inquiry is contemplated."

AUTHOR

 

Recommended for you

 

MARKET INSIGHTS

sub-bg sidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

Squeaky'21

My view is that after 2026 there will be quite a bit less than 10,000 'advisers' (investment advisers) and less than 100...

1 week ago
Jason Warlond

Dugald makes a great point that not everyone's definition of green is the same and gives a good example. Funds have bee...

1 week ago
Jasmin Jakupovic

How did they get the AFSL in the first place? Given the green light by ASIC. This is terrible example of ASIC's incompet...

1 week 1 day ago

AustralianSuper and Australian Retirement Trust have posted the financial results for the 2022–23 financial year for their combined 5.3 million members....

9 months 1 week ago

A $34 billion fund has come out on top with a 13.3 per cent return in the last 12 months, beating out mega funds like Australian Retirement Trust and Aware Super. ...

9 months ago

The verdict in the class action case against AMP Financial Planning has been delivered in the Federal Court by Justice Moshinsky....

9 months 2 weeks ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND