IOOF rebuts class action claims
IOOF has sought to defend itself in the face of a class action moves by plaintiff law firm, Maurice Blackburn, claiming the proposed action is "misconceived both factually and at law".
In a statement issued on the Australian Securities Exchange (ASX) in the wake of a call by Maurice Blackburn seeking expressions of interest from IOOF shareholders in a class action, IOOF said it was confident in its position and rejected claims that it had breached its continuous disclosure obligations or might have engaged in misleading or deceptive conduct.
"IOOF complies with the law in relation to its continuous disclosure obligations and rejects any suggestion that its approach is inadequate," it said.
"In the interests of its shareholders, IOOF will vigorously defend any claim."
Maurice Blackburn yesterday claimed an investigation into alleged regulatory breaches by IOOF, had "reached a critical point".
In doing so, the law firm called for institutional and retail investors who purchased shares in the company between 1 December 2013 and 19 June 2015, to register their interest and claims.
IOOF found itself in the spotlight amid media reports of failings within its research department with the reports later giving rise to strong questioning of IOOF managing director, Chris Kelaher, by a Senate Committee.
Recommended for you
Multiple industry organisations have shared their thoughts on AFCA’s proposed rules amendment, supporting the idea of firms being named publicly when they fail to comply with determinations.
Channel Capital has appointed a head of investment oversight who joins from 14 years at asset consulting firm JANA Investment Advisers.
Licensee Centrepoint Alliance has completed the acquisition of Brighter Super’s annual review service advice book, via Financial Advice Matters.
ASIC has launched court proceedings against the responsible entity of three managed investment schemes with around 600 retail investors.
