FOS rebuts harsh criticism

ASIC financial ombudsman service parliamentary joint committee australian securities and investments commission chairman money management

30 July 2014
| By Mike |
image
image
expand image

The Financial Ombudsman Service (FOS) has sought to refute claims that it has been guilty of unsound and unreasonable findings and that it has protected responsible entities to the detriment of investors. 

The chief ombudsman, Shane Tregillis has written to Money Management seeking to rebut the claims contained in a letter to South Australian Senator, David Fawcett, chair of the Parliamentary Joint Committee on Corporations and Financial Services, by Russell James Keeling, chairman of the Victims of FOS Committee. 

Tregillis has defended the record of the FOS, saying that contrary to the claims made in Keeling’s letter the Ombudsman Service was accountable for the decisions it made. 

He particularly rebutted suggestions that applicants had no right of appeal if they did not accept a FOS determination. 

“While FOS decisions are binding on the financial services provider, applicants retain the rights they would otherwise have to pursue their dispute in the courts,” he said. 

“Contrary to claims made in the article, FOS is accountable. FOS is approved by ASIC and a condition of ASIC approval is that an independent review of FOS is undertaken periodically,” Tregillis said. 

Pointing to the latest review of FOS, he said that while it had highlighted the importance of improving the time taken by FOS to resolve disputes, “the review noted the quality of FOS decision making and robust quality assurance measures that FOS has in place”. 

“In response to the review’s findings we are addressing the way we work and considering changes to our Terms of Reference,” the Chief Ombudsman said. 

He said that in addition to the recently completed independent review, the role and activities of external dispute resolution schemes had been the subject of a Productivity Commission review into Access to Justice Arrangements, the Senate Economic Reference committee Inquiry into the Performance of the Australian Securities and Investments Commission and the Financial Systems Inquiry. 

Read more about:

AUTHOR

 

Recommended for you

 

MARKET INSIGHTS

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

Chris Cornish

By having trustees supervise client directed payments from their pension funds, Stephen Jones and the federal Labor gove...

1 day 8 hours ago
Chris Cornish

Now we now the size of Stephen Jones' CSOLR tax, I doubt anyone will be employer any new financial adviser from this poi...

1 day 8 hours ago
JOHN GILLIES

Amazing ! Between the beginning of licencing Feb 2002 and 2008 this was a very good stable industry.Then the do-gooders...

2 days 3 hours ago

AustralianSuper and Australian Retirement Trust have posted the financial results for the 2022–23 financial year for their combined 5.3 million members....

10 months 1 week ago

A $34 billion fund has come out on top with a 13.3 per cent return in the last 12 months, beating out mega funds like Australian Retirement Trust and Aware Super. ...

10 months ago

The verdict in the class action case against AMP Financial Planning has been delivered in the Federal Court by Justice Moshinsky....

10 months 1 week ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND