FOS case questions determinations process

financial ombudsman service

29 May 2014
| By Staff |
image
image
expand image

Questions have been raised regarding determinations made by the Financial Ombudsman Service (FOS) after a recent court case argued it should not be able to make decisions ‘which no reasonable tribunal could properly come to on the evidence'.

The case - FOS vs Pioneer Credit Acquisition Services - heard in the Victorian Supreme Court last month examined whether FOS is required to correctly decide a question of law which it is required to decide.

It also examined whether FOS should restrict itself to settling consumer disputes and not acting in the same manner as a court and settling disputes as if they were legal proceedings and whether FOS should avoid making decisions that would not be reached by other tribunals using the same evidence.

While the case was settled in favour of FOS King and Wood Mallesons senior associate Travis Toemoe stated that laywers were troubled at the idea that a FOS determination was binding on a member and cannot be appealed.

Toemoe said lawyers also remained concerned that FOS can determine disputes by referring to matters beyond the applicable law.

"In common law jurisdictions the role of an arbiter of disputes (a court) is to interpret the law, not to make it. From a lawyer's perspective, the role of FOS seems to encompass both the role of courts and the role of the legislature," Toemoe said.

"Whilst one can see the attractiveness of a fast, cheap and efficient dispute resolution service such as that provided by FOS, is that outweighed by the rights foregone by members? Do members really want to continue to expose themselves to a DR process where the law is only one of many considerations in determining a dispute?"

Read more about:

AUTHOR

 

Recommended for you

 

MARKET INSIGHTS

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

JOHN GILLIES

What does he do after three years???.He sits FEW EXAMS GETS THEM RIGHT ONCE and he can apply again promising to be a go...

1 day 18 hours ago
Ross Smith

I have been making this advocation for more than 10 years, that banning a financial adviser like this is hopeless like a...

1 day 18 hours ago
Simon

...and not to forget if I'm a butcher, a baker, or candle stick maker then I'm a 'Qualified Adviser'!!! - sorry couldn't...

1 day 19 hours ago

AustralianSuper and Australian Retirement Trust have posted the financial results for the 2022–23 financial year for their combined 5.3 million members....

10 months 2 weeks ago

A $34 billion fund has come out on top with a 13.3 per cent return in the last 12 months, beating out mega funds like Australian Retirement Trust and Aware Super. ...

10 months ago

The verdict in the class action case against AMP Financial Planning has been delivered in the Federal Court by Justice Moshinsky....

10 months 2 weeks ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND