Expand CSLR to AFCA: FPA

FPA AFCA CSLR Ben Marshan

16 December 2021
| By Laura Dew |
image
image
expand image

The compensation scheme of last resort (CSLR) should be expanded to include the jurisdiction of the Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA), according to the Financial Planning Association of Australia (FPA), but should not be applied retrospectively.

Appearing before the Senate Economics Committee, Ben Marshan, head of policy, strategic and innovation at the FPA, told the committee that CSLR should be expanded to ensure a sustainable funding model.

“We feel the scheme should be expanded to incorporate the jurisdiction of AFCA to ensure there is a sustainable funding model for the scheme and that levies are calculated based on the risks posed by the particular sub-sectors. It would also mean that consumers are adequately protected by the scheme,” he said.

“We don’t necessarily believe that the current scheme should be retrospective but it does need to be broadened out to ensure fairness and adequate compensation and protection for consumers.

“You’ve got financial services that assault consumers but consumers have no ability to make a complaint to the external dispute resolution body because there’s no requirement for them to be a member of the scheme.”

Managed investment schemes, such as Sterling, were not currently required to be a member of the CSLR but the FPA felt the scheme was too narrow in scope and should be changed to include all types of financial products.

He was also asked by a committee member whether Sterling could have done with additional risk information but Marshan said he felt that adding extra information would “switch off” consumers.

“I don’t think adding extra layers of financial reporting and risk statements is going to help the consumer understand whether or not the product is risky. In fact, they are going to switch off even more,” he said

“I also make the point that if the regulator is not regulating these products then we need to stop calling them a regulator and just call them an administrator.”

The FPA had previously told the committee that consumers failed to understand when they were receiving personal advice, particularly at events or seminar where products such as Sterling Income Trust were promoted.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

 

Recommended for you

 

MARKET INSIGHTS

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

Time to Go

I really can't see how getting rid of the safeguards with no other changes achieves anything at all. We're still the ea...

1 day 20 hours ago
Rob

Nowhere else in the world do innocent bystanders have to pay for the losses incurred to investors due to failed business...

2 days ago
Time to Go

Yet everything states profitability is much higher in a larger practice. As a smaller planning practice it is a hard sl...

3 days 16 hours ago

AustralianSuper and Australian Retirement Trust have posted the financial results for the 2022–23 financial year for their combined 5.3 million members....

10 months 1 week ago

A $34 billion fund has come out on top with a 13.3 per cent return in the last 12 months, beating out mega funds like Australian Retirement Trust and Aware Super. ...

9 months 4 weeks ago

The verdict in the class action case against AMP Financial Planning has been delivered in the Federal Court by Justice Moshinsky....

10 months 1 week ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND