Cancellation and 10-year bans for ‘layered advice’ approach

ASIC national advice solutions banning Gold Coast layered advice

16 December 2022
| By Laura Dew |
image
image
expand image

The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has banned two responsible managers for 10 years and cancelled the Australian financial services (AFS) licence of National Advice Solutions.

National Advice Solutions used a ‘layered advice’ approach whereby the licensee separated the advice into pre-determined topics, regardless of the client’s personal circumstances, goals or advice needs. Its cancellation was effective from 13 December, 2022.

The ‘layered advice’ approach was found to actively impede financial advisers from complying with the financial services laws, as clients were provided with expensive and templated advice that was inappropriate for their personal circumstances.

This was ASIC’s second AFS cancellation regarding ‘layered advice’ following the Smart Solutions Group in February 2020.

Responsible managers, Gail Glasby and Paul Carcallas, based in the Gold Coast, were banned from providing financial services for 10 years after they failed to adequately monitor and supervise its authorised representatives and maintain competence to provide the financial services covered by its licence.

ASIC also found the pair bore part of the responsibility for the systemic failings that arose from the use of the ‘layered advice strategy’.

Carcallas also provided financial advice and ASIC found he did not act in their best interest, gave inappropriate advice and prioritied his own or the licensees’ interest over the client. Advice was templated, inappropriately scoped, and he failed to identify or consider the relevant circumstances of the clients when preparing the advice.

Further, ASIC found that the statements of advice (SOAs) provided were defective, contained projections not based on recommendations provided and failed to include all costs associated with implementing the recommendations.

ASIC found that these projections were included to persuade the clients to proceed with the advice and cost omissions may have led clients to believe they would have more funds available in retirement than they could realistically expect.

The banning of Glasby and Carcallas would be recorded on ASIC's publicly available Financial Advisers Register and the Banned and Disqualified Persons Register.

All three parties had the right to seek a review of ASIC's decision at the Administrative Appeals Tribunal.

 

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Submitted by Anon on Fri, 2022-12-16 16:07

bit like what Super funds want to do under QAR but different. same same but different.

Submitted by headscratcher on Fri, 2022-12-16 17:20

about time, they are crooks.

Add new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
 

Recommended for you

 

MARKET INSIGHTS

sub-bg sidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

Random

What happened to the 700,000 million of MLC if $1.2 Billion was migrated to Expand but Expand had only 512 Million in in...

2 days ago
JOHN GILLIES

The judge was quite undrstanding! THEN AASSIICC comes along and closes him down!All you 15600 people who work in the bu...

2 days 21 hours ago
JOHN GILLIES

How could that underestimate happen?usually the quote transfer straight into the SOA, and what on earth has the commissi...

2 days 22 hours ago

AustralianSuper and Australian Retirement Trust have posted the financial results for the 2022–23 financial year for their combined 5.3 million members....

9 months 4 weeks ago

A $34 billion fund has come out on top with a 13.3 per cent return in the last 12 months, beating out mega funds like Australian Retirement Trust and Aware Super. ...

9 months 2 weeks ago

The verdict in the class action case against AMP Financial Planning has been delivered in the Federal Court by Justice Moshinsky....

9 months 4 weeks ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND