Bendigo and Adelaide rebut Great Southern reprise

Bendigo Bank Adelaide Bank investment scheme

31 July 2018
| By Mike |
image
image
expand image

If investors in the collapsed Great Southern agricultural managed investment scheme claimed tax deductions on the loans they took out to fund their investments then it follows they could not have been fraudulent loans, according to Bendigo and Adelaide Bank.

In a strong rebuttal of media suggestions that it had acted harshly with investors impacted by the 2009 collapse of the agricultural managed investment scheme, Bendigo and Adelaide claimed it was most unlikely any of the loans were fraudulent because taking out a loan was optional and because borrowers received significant up-front tax deductions.

The banking group said that it had not acted in an aggressive or unethical manner in its dealing with Great Southern investors and rejected any such accusations.

“The bank is not responsible for the inappropriate advice and fraudulent loans provided by some advisors,” it said. “The bank provided no financial advice to any investor or borrower that invested in the Great Southern schemes, and the loan application signed by the borrower recommended they obtain their own independent legal, accounting and taxation advice regarding both investment and borrowing.”

Bendigo and Adelaide also pointed out that while a class action had been filed against the bank on behalf of investors in many schemes managed by Great Southern, the lead plaintiffs had moved prior to judgement for settlement.

“Their willingness to settle reflected the weak case they pursued, best summed up by Justice Croft’s view; ‘there does not seem to be a clearer example of where a party breaches its overreaching obligation to ensure that any claims is brought before the court has a proper basis …’,” the banking group said.

Bendigo and Adelaide confirmed that as at 31 December, 1033 borrowers (87 per cent) still owed $86.1 million to the bank but claimed that the vast majority had made arrangements to repay following the Supreme Court of Victoria approval of a settlement deed concluding the class action in 2014.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

 

Recommended for you

 

MARKET INSIGHTS

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

blake stevens

spot on Mark...

54 minutes ago
David Williams

'Hypersensitised' advice is likely to be successful if based on a more hypersensitive approach to each person. This is ...

4 hours ago
JOHN GILLIES

I CAN NOT THINK OF A WORD TO SAY HOW BLOODY STUPID CAN YOU GET JG...

1 day ago

AustralianSuper and Australian Retirement Trust have posted the financial results for the 2022–23 financial year for their combined 5.3 million members....

10 months 1 week ago

A $34 billion fund has come out on top with a 13.3 per cent return in the last 12 months, beating out mega funds like Australian Retirement Trust and Aware Super. ...

9 months 4 weeks ago

The verdict in the class action case against AMP Financial Planning has been delivered in the Federal Court by Justice Moshinsky....

10 months 1 week ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND