BEAR will make bank wealth and insurance uncompetitive

Including wealth management and insurance operations within the terms of the Bank Executive Accountability Regime (BEAR) will hamper their ability to compete, according to the Australian Bankers’ Association (ABA).

Calling for a six-month extension to the implementation time-table for the BEAR, ABA chief executive, Anna Bligh said that, according to the legislation, BEAR would not only apply to banks but to all their subsidiaries as well.

“Large banks have hundreds of subsidiaries therefore the regime would capture a large number of mid-level and junior executives,” she said. “If banks’ insurance and wealth management businesses are also caught up in the regime it will affect banks’ ability to compete.”

Related News:

“The draft legislation proposes that APRA can disqualify a person, effectively destroying their career, and doesn’t allow the person to have that life-changing decision reviewed to make sure the law was applied consistently,” Bligh said. Protecting an individual’s rights and ensuring procedural fairness is essential if the BEAR itself is seen to have integrity and consistency with other laws in Australia.”

“To achieve this the ABA strongly recommends that the merits of any disqualification decision by APRA must be able to be reviewed, and that APRA has to apply to the Federal Court to disqualify an individual,” she said.

What constitutes a breach is also unclear in the legislation, with no definition provided of behaviour that affects ‘prudential standing’ or ‘reputation’.

“Neither of these terms are defined, nor do they have an equivalent in any other law,” Bligh said.

“With so much important detail still to be worked out by the Federal Government and regulators, the banking industry is seeking an additional six months to implement BEAR (1 January 2019), or one year after the finalisation of all relevant APRA rules,” she said.

Related Content

Soft dollars confirmed as factor in insurance within super

Soft dollar benefits between insurance companies and superannuation funds are a factor in virtually all insurance within superannuation commercial mod...more

As few as 50 advisers at risk of ‘churning’

The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has further defined the degree of so-called “churn” in the life/risk sector acknowledg...more

‘Scandal-ridden banks’ untrustworthy on insurance

The “scandal-ridden” banks are the second biggest provider of group insurance but cannot be trusted to act in the best interests of Australians, a...more




Oh my God!!! If BEAR is implemented it will make bank wealth and insurance uncompetitive. How will the world be able to cope if those crazy, zany bunch of bankers aren't helping us all with their wonderful products? And what's more, we should also be sparing a thought for those poor executives as the legislation can act to disqualify them, effectively "destroying their career' Oh no, that can't be true, they don't deserve that. And what's even worse, according to Anna it could also affect both mid-level and junior executives. This has got to be stopped, those junior executives are the future, It is they that will carry the banner of quality advice into the future. Is it only me and Anna that seem to want to carry the baton for this downtrodden, mistreated and abused section of the community. Let's all try and save that wonderful, shining light of truth and justice, the bank executive.
CBA to pay at least $32m in remediation actions
15 August 2017 - who put this article here!

How can forcing the execs to be accountable effect profits or ability to compete unless the profits are being derived through dodgy dealings???

Add new comment