Bank executive regime could extend to licensees, insurers

Financial planning licensees, insurance and superannuation fund executives could find themselves bound up in the Government’s new Bank Executive Accountability Regime (BEAR) if they are part of a vertically-integrated bank structure.

The Minister for Revenue and Financial Services, Kelly O’Dwyer has released the Government’s discussion paper around the new BEAR regime which makes clear that not only banks but their insurance, superannuation and other subsidiaries could be covered.

The Government’s discussion paper directly asks market participants whether the definition of accountable persons should “apply to individuals in the subsidiaries of a group or subgroup with an ADI [authorised deposit-taking institution] parent, including where the subsidiaries are not regulated by APRA [Australian Prudential Regulation Authority]”.

Related News:

Dealing with the question of who will be deemed “accountable persons”, the Government’s discussion paper states that the definition of an accountable person “could also include directors and senior executives of the subsidiaries within a group or subgroup with an ADI [bank] parent.

Dealing with the breadth of the BEAR, the discussion paper said: “The net should not be cast so wide that responsibility can be deflected and accountability avoided. The risk is that if everybody is responsible, nobody will be accountable. On the other hand, the definition of accountable persons should not be cast too narrowly so as to exclude individuals with effective responsibility for management and control”.

“The extent to which ADIs would register accountable persons under this element of the definition would vary depending on differences in business models and group structures” the discussion said. “An example of a function that could be assumed to meet this criteria would include the head of a key business area,” it said. “This function would be responsible for the management of a significant proportion of the ADI business or activity, based on its proportion of total gross assets, revenue or profit.”

“This function could include directors or senior executives of subsidiaries within a group or subgroup with an ADI parent,” the discussion paper said.




Related Content

Weaving the web of aged care

It is time for planners to bring aged care advice into sharper focus and initiate conversations with their clients around cost, structures, and implic...more

A BDM who’s steering adviser conversations

The business development manager (BDM) role has evolved as much as the role of an adviser over the last 10 years. For Joe Gennusa the role of the BDM ...more

Morrison’s new warning to banks

The Federal Treasurer, Scott Morrison has fired a thinly-veiled shot across the bows of the major banks about not seeking to pass through the cost of ...more

Author

Comments

Comments

How about also extending that same accountability to ISA, politicians, regulators and even FOS - all these groups are far from perfect (if not outright incompetent or corrupt).

Add new comment