Bank executive regime could extend to licensees, insurers

Financial planning licensees, insurance and superannuation fund executives could find themselves bound up in the Government’s new Bank Executive Accountability Regime (BEAR) if they are part of a vertically-integrated bank structure.

The Minister for Revenue and Financial Services, Kelly O’Dwyer has released the Government’s discussion paper around the new BEAR regime which makes clear that not only banks but their insurance, superannuation and other subsidiaries could be covered.

The Government’s discussion paper directly asks market participants whether the definition of accountable persons should “apply to individuals in the subsidiaries of a group or subgroup with an ADI [authorised deposit-taking institution] parent, including where the subsidiaries are not regulated by APRA [Australian Prudential Regulation Authority]”.

Related News:

Dealing with the question of who will be deemed “accountable persons”, the Government’s discussion paper states that the definition of an accountable person “could also include directors and senior executives of the subsidiaries within a group or subgroup with an ADI [bank] parent.

Dealing with the breadth of the BEAR, the discussion paper said: “The net should not be cast so wide that responsibility can be deflected and accountability avoided. The risk is that if everybody is responsible, nobody will be accountable. On the other hand, the definition of accountable persons should not be cast too narrowly so as to exclude individuals with effective responsibility for management and control”.

“The extent to which ADIs would register accountable persons under this element of the definition would vary depending on differences in business models and group structures” the discussion said. “An example of a function that could be assumed to meet this criteria would include the head of a key business area,” it said. “This function would be responsible for the management of a significant proportion of the ADI business or activity, based on its proportion of total gross assets, revenue or profit.”

“This function could include directors or senior executives of subsidiaries within a group or subgroup with an ADI parent,” the discussion paper said.




Related Content

Are super funds selling their members short on tax?

Australian superannuation funds could be selling their members short by up to a combined $6 billion a year because they are not managing their tax pos...more

Industry Super claims bank rort on ATO super changes

Industry Super Australia (ISA) has accused Government policy-makers of caving into big bank pressure to shape new rules around Single Touch Payroll (S...more

Aussie IPOs lower in H2

Despite geopolitical impacts and volatility, the market saw strong capital raisings driven by M&A activity and equity raised in share placements t...more

Author

Comments

Comments

How about also extending that same accountability to ISA, politicians, regulators and even FOS - all these groups are far from perfect (if not outright incompetent or corrupt).

Add new comment