ASIC points to insurer comparison site selling its owner’s products
At least one life insurance company owns a life insurance comparison website through which it distributes at least some of its products direct to consumers, according to the Australian Securities and Investment Commission (ASIC).
What is more, the regulator has pointed to the possibility of consumers being misled if they are not aware that the products being promoted on the website are actually issued by the owner of the website.
Answering questions on notice from the Parliamentary Joint Committee on Corporations and Financial Services, the regulator reinforced its concerns about vertical integration noting, “Because of their structure, vertically integrated entities face inherent conflicts of interest”.
Then, dealing with question of direct insurance sales, the ASIC answer noted that it was “aware of at least one business model where a life insurer owns a life insurance comparison website”.
“The comparison website distributes some life insurance direct to consumers without personal advice,” it said. “Generally, the comparison website directs the consumer to the life insurer to complete the sale. In this case, the distribution costs are represented by the insurer's costs in operating the website.”
“There may be a risk that the consumer may be misled if they are not aware that some of the products promoted on the website are issued by the owner of the website,” the answer said.
ASIC said that it had issued a regulatory guide (RG 234) which provided guidance about disclosing any connections to the providers of the products that were being compared (eg common ownership) to help ensure that consumers were not misled about the influence of the connection on the product promotion.
AUTHOR
Mike Taylor
Recommended for you
ASIC chair Joe Longo has told a Senate select committee that it has been running two pilot AI programs, including one to read public submissions.
The decision to scale up a small advice practice can be a difficult judgement call. Money Management speaks with two advisers on whether the potential gains outweigh the initial costs for their business.
The popularity of ETFs, which are approaching $200 billion in Australia, is a potential threat to the advice landscape if consumers opt to invest directly, according to this senior partner.
A former AMP financial adviser has urged advisers in the BOLR class action against AMP to object to the “unfair and unreasonable” $100 million settlement sum as the objection deadline approaches on 22 May.
