ASIC calls on OTC derivatives sector to improve practices
The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has called on participants in the retail over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives sector to improve their practices after identifying a number of risks associated with these products.
ASIC said its review found that client losses in retail OTC derivatives trades were high, with the percentage of unprofitable traders up to 80 per cent for binary options, 72 per cent for contracts for difference (CFD) traders and 63 per cent for margin FX traders.
Following this, the most concerning practices of the sector included:
- Actual client profits being inconsistent with marketing materials,
- A lack of transparency around pricing,
- Risk management practices that relied on the use of client money were outdated and needed to be reviewed,
- Some referral arrangement that may be in breach of conflicted remuneration requirements and referral selling prohibitions,
- Some issuers that were providing wholesale services or allowing third parties to “white label” their products did not have adequate risk management practices and operational capital to supervise counterparties and support their exposures.
According to ASIC commissioner, Cathie Armour, the retail OTC derivatives sector in Australia was a growing market, with an annual turnover of $11 trillion and attracting over 450,000 investors.
“The integrity of the retail OTC derivatives sector is a key focus for ASIC,” she said.
“ASIC expects licensed issuers to conduct themselves appropriately and ensure consumers trade in retail OTC derivatives with a clear understanding of the products and the risks to which they’re exposed.
“We will be working with issuers to raise industry standards and improve compliance with their Australia financial services licence obligations.”
The products offered by this sector in Australia include binary options, margin foreign exchanges and contracts for difference, the regulator said.
Recommended for you
ASIC has called on superannuation funds to improve their oversight of advice fee deductions following an investigation of 10 trustees that found $990 million was charged in one year.
Financial services lawyers believe the government may have good intentions, but the proposed legislation leaves superannuation trustees targeting an unachievable “standard of perfection” when it comes to advice deductions.
Advisers could find themselves unable to receive the fair market price of their advice as the Delivering Better Financial Outcomes legislation states superannuation trustees can reject deductions that are not charged on a cost basis.
Two advice professionals have shared five key takeaways as to how advisers can strengthen their communication with clients, especially at review time, in order to build deeper relationships.