Are there code of ethics risks for advisers making retirement income recommendations?

Andrew Lowe challenger John Maroney smsf association Shail Singh AFCA Shaune Egan amp Tim Dowling Allianz retire plus FASEA retirement retirement income

8 July 2020
| By Mike |
image
image
expand image

Companies with a heavy focus on annuities-based products are facing a challenge with financial advisers making clear that the likelihood of a prolonged low interest rate environment makes it difficult to build an annuities-based retirement income strategy.

What is more, there are questions around the types of recommendations advisers can make about such strategies in a prolonged low rate environment in light of the strictures of the Financial Adviser Standards and Ethics Authority (FASEA) code of ethics, particularly Standards 5 and 6.

The early results of a survey currently being conducted by Money Management ahead of its free Retirement Incomes Webinar on July 15 (sign up here) had revealed strong adviser concern around recommending annuities in the current environment – something which will be discussed by a panel of experts which will include the Australian Financial Complaints Authority’s (AFCA’s) ombudsman, Shail Singh.

Respondents to the survey were asked whether, given the likelihood of an extended period of low or even zero interest rates, they regarded annuities as remaining central to retirement income strategies. And their answers will concern annuities-focused business such as Challenger and AllianzRetire together with a number of industry superannuation funds who have made annuities a part of their member product offering.

The survey found that 80% of respondents were not currently regarding annuities as central to their discussions with clients around retirement incomes strategies.

But, at the same time, the survey made clear that the most frequent advice being provided to advisers to their clients who were approaching or had reached retirement was that they should hold to their strategies, avoid crystallising their loss and look to the long-term.

Interestingly, the survey revealed that the majority of advisers were not recommending that their clients necessarily stay longer in the workforce.

Asked whether they were recommending that those clients who could should defer their retirements, 60% of respondents answered no.

The Money Management retirement incomes webinar will an authoritative panel made up of:

  • Andrew Lowe, Challenger
  • John Maroney, SMSF Association
  • Shail Singh, AFCA
  • Shaune Egan, AMP
  • Tim Dowling, Allianz Retire+

Advisers can participate in the continuing Retirement Incomes survey here.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

 

Recommended for you

 

MARKET INSIGHTS

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

Time to Go

I really can't see how getting rid of the safeguards with no other changes achieves anything at all. We're still the ea...

21 hours 37 minutes ago
Rob

Nowhere else in the world do innocent bystanders have to pay for the losses incurred to investors due to failed business...

1 day ago
Time to Go

Yet everything states profitability is much higher in a larger practice. As a smaller planning practice it is a hard sl...

2 days 17 hours ago

AustralianSuper and Australian Retirement Trust have posted the financial results for the 2022–23 financial year for their combined 5.3 million members....

10 months 1 week ago

A $34 billion fund has come out on top with a 13.3 per cent return in the last 12 months, beating out mega funds like Australian Retirement Trust and Aware Super. ...

9 months 3 weeks ago

The verdict in the class action case against AMP Financial Planning has been delivered in the Federal Court by Justice Moshinsky....

10 months 1 week ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND