Advisers can’t be trusted says ISA

industry super australia ISA post retirement products post retirements financial advice financial planning Royal Commission trust

30 January 2019
| By Mike |
image
image
expand image

Just days out from the final report of the Royal Commission, Industry Super Australia (ISA) has told a key parliamentary committee that it should not be assumed that financial advisers can be trusted to give superannuation fund members advice on selecting post retirement products.

In a submission to the Senate Economics Legislation Committee, ISA pointed to both the Royal Commission interim report and the recent findings of the Productivity Commission to argue that it should not be assumed that retirees will be able to rely on financial advice in making their post-retirement product selections.

It stated: “In short, the current financial advice regime cannot be relied upon to protect consumers”.

“It might be argued that retirees will be able to make effective choices between different pooled products after 1 July 2019 by utilising financial advice,” the ISA submission said but then pointed to the Productivity Commission’s recent final inquiry report which it said “provides support for the view that the current regulatory framework for financial advice cannot be relied upon to connect retirees to the best income products”.

“It observes that: ‘Despite the Future of Financial Advice reforms, conflicted financial advice remains an egregious problem (especially within vertically integrated organisations)’,” the submission said.

The ISA submission said the interim findings of the Royal Commission had also “highlighted a number of recurring problems with advice provided by advisors employed or franchised by for-profit product providers”.

“In particular the Royal Commission found that the routine provision of advice that was in the best interests of the advisor and product provider – rather than the client,” it said. “FOFA has proven ineffectual partly because it does not actually require advisers to act on the best interests of their clients, permitting advisers to recommend in-house products when other products may be more appropriate.”

Read more about:

AUTHOR

 

Recommended for you

 

MARKET INSIGHTS

sub-bg sidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

Big Feller

This can't be a surprising development. I'm sure every Financial Planner in Australia has had an experience of being sc...

12 hours ago
One foot out the door

Just 15 per cent of advisers said they may exit the industry over the next few years, Thats about 2,300 advisers! if ...

17 hours ago
Craig Offenhauser

I think Mr. Toohey's conclusions and extrapolations are "currently" merging on the typical SMSF issue of "....prone to ...

3 days 11 hours ago

AustralianSuper and Australian Retirement Trust have posted the financial results for the 2022–23 financial year for their combined 5.3 million members....

10 months ago

A $34 billion fund has come out on top with a 13.3 per cent return in the last 12 months, beating out mega funds like Australian Retirement Trust and Aware Super. ...

9 months 2 weeks ago

The verdict in the class action case against AMP Financial Planning has been delivered in the Federal Court by Justice Moshinsky....

10 months ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND