AAT bans adviser over Westpoint advice
A former Westpoint adviser has been banned from providing financial services for a period of three years by the Administrative Appeals Tribunal (AAT).
Denise Simmons of Brisbane had applied to the AAT for a review of an earlier decision by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) to ban her. However, the application did not make it to the hearing stage, with both Simmons and ASIC consenting to the AAT's orders.
ASIC's investigation found Simmons made recommendations to clients at two former places of employment - Online Super and Diversified Funds Management - to invest in Westpoint products with money from their self-managed superannuation funds.
ASIC said "in light of the level of risk and size of the clients' investments in Westpoint", Simmons failed to give proper consideration to her clients' circumstances when making the recommendations, and did not make adequate enquiries into the products she recommended.
Further, she was found to have made "misleading and deceptive statements to her clients about the level of risk associated with the investments, and the measures intended to protect their investments".
Simmons also did not adequately and uniformly disclose the commissions she would receive from her clients' investments.
Simmons' ban extends to January 12, 2012. She is one of 24 licensed advisers who advised on Westpoint products and have been banned from providing financial services, as well as four unlicensed advisers and one corporate entity.
AUTHOR
Amal Awad
Recommended for you
The Financial Advice Association Australia has released its pre-budget submission, including six key items to help reduce the cost of professional advice and increase its accessibility.
Phil Anderson, general manager for financial advice at the FAAA, believes the CSLR levy could reach $100 million if Dixon Advisory complaints are allowed to continue.
Proposed legislative changes to safe harbour duty could result in advisers having reduced professional indemnity costs, a joint submission by seven major licensees said.
With 66 per cent of newly established advice licensees being sole advisers, what are the risks and legal ramifications to consider when taking the plunge into self-licensing?
