FOFA flaws laid bare by PJC
It became apparent during the Parliamentary Joint Committee hearings held to review the Future of Financial Advice (FOFA) bills that the legislation requires significant amendment, writes Mike Taylor.
One thing became very clear during last week's public hearings of the Parliamentary Joint Committee (PJC) reviewing the Future of Financial Advice (FOFA) bills – the legislation requires significant amendment to ensure it meets its objectives and avoids any unintended consequences.
The big question, of course, is whether the parliamentarians who make up the joint committee are sufficiently capable of putting aside partisan party political interests to deliver the necessary amendments.
In truth, most pressure will be on the Labor Party members of the committee, because many of the necessary amendments bring into question the competence of one of their most ambitious colleagues and factional players – the Minister for Employment and Workplace Relations and Minister for Financial Services and Superannuation, Bill Shorten.
Then too, there is the level of influence some trade union officials and industry superannuation fund trustees can exert on members of the Federal Parliamentary Labor Party.
However, with a number of the current Labor committee members having participated in delivering the bipartisan report of the PJC which gave rise to the FOFA changes, they should have no problem in supporting amendments designed to ensure the legislation achieves its original objectives.
In many respects, legislation introduced by a minister during his/her time overseeing a portfolio stands as both a legacy and a measure of their competence to hold higher office.
With that being the case, any reading of the submissions to the PJC and the transcripts of last week's public hearings suggests Bill Shorten has an issue with consistency, clarity and detail.
Just as the Financial Services Reform Act represented the single most important policy change impacting the financial services industry in the first decade of the new millennium, the FOFA regime represents the most important change impacting at least the next two decades.
It follows that it is imperative that the Government gets the balance right.
What became clear last week is that sufficient evidence has been delivered to the PJC to confirm the necessary balance has not been achieved and that some significant amendments are necessary to avoid not only distortions but also unintended consequences.
It is to be hoped that policy common sense will prevail among the members of the PJC and that a bipartisan set of recommendations can be developed capable of translating FOFA into viable long-term change for the financial services industry.
If the minister then fails to accept those recommendations and amendments, then he must accept history’s ultimate judgement of his legacy.
AUTHOR
Staff Writer
Recommended for you
In this episode of Relative Return, host Laura Dew speaks with Andrew Mitchell, director and senior portfolio manager at Ophir Asset Management, about why he loves working in fund management and the lessons he’s learnt in a decade of running a firm.
In this episode of Relative Return, host Laura Dew speaks with Blackwattle Investment Partners managing director and chief investment officer, Michael Skinner, about setting up an asset manager and what he looks for in an investment team.
In this special episode of Relative Return, Momentum Media’s Phil Tarrant and Jordan Coleman discuss the publishing house’s expansion into greater coverage of the wealth management space.
In this episode of Relative Return, host Maja Garaca Djurdjevic speaks with Riley James, founder and chief executive of fintech SuperAPI, about creating a superannuation ecosystem and potential changes from the Quality of Advice Review.
