X
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact
  • Expert Resources
Get the latest news! Subscribe to the Money Management bulletin
  • News
    • Accounting
    • Financial Planning
    • Funds Management
    • Life/Risk
    • People & Products
    • Policy & Regulation
    • Property
    • SMSF
    • Superannuation
    • Tech
  • Investment
    • Australian Equities
    • Global Equities
    • Managed Accounts
    • Fixed Income
    • ETFs
  • Features
    • Editorial
    • Expert Analysis
    • Guides
    • Outsider
    • Rate The Raters
    • Top 100
  • Media
    • Events
    • Podcast
    • Webcasts
  • Promoted Content
  • Investment Centre
No Results
View All Results
  • News
    • Accounting
    • Financial Planning
    • Funds Management
    • Life/Risk
    • People & Products
    • Policy & Regulation
    • Property
    • SMSF
    • Superannuation
    • Tech
  • Investment
    • Australian Equities
    • Global Equities
    • Managed Accounts
    • Fixed Income
    • ETFs
  • Features
    • Editorial
    • Expert Analysis
    • Guides
    • Outsider
    • Rate The Raters
    • Top 100
  • Media
    • Events
    • Podcast
    • Webcasts
  • Promoted Content
  • Investment Centre
No Results
View All Results
No Results
View All Results
Home Features Editorial

Why are investors settling for less?

by Staff Writer
November 15, 2012
in Australian Equities, Editorial, Features, Investment Insights
Reading Time: 4 mins read
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Instead of settling for safe but sub-average returns, investors should seek out good investment managers, Johan de Lange argues.

The investment industry must be one of the only disciplines where buyers pay a significant price for a product that adds no value. Index investing is such a product yet their popularity with investors would indicate otherwise. 

X

A recent media report stated that: “Indexed funds under management have enjoyed enormous popularity since the GFC, with assets outgrowing non-indexed funds under management by a factor of seven to one.” 

It has been argued many times that using exchange-traded funds or indexed funds in the creation of an investment strategy is an accepted and sensible approach offering a number of benefits.

At its core, the investor will not be exposed to an underperforming manager for a management fee north of 1 per cent in the retail market.

In the investment world value is often assessed by historic returns.

While the quality of the team, the research process, the approach and the like are all-important, ultimately the result is performance which is there for everyone to see. It is the most tangible thing the industry has to offer.

Most investors buy the expectation of future returns, a difficult decision made even trickier by the fact that an active manager’s expectation to outperform has only a 25 per cent chance of delivering (based on research by Julie Agnew and Lisa Szykman in 2004 entitled: Asset Allocation and Information Overload).

For investors who want exposure to the market and who want to beat the 7 per cent real return Australian shares have offered over the last century it seems logical to choose an indexed fund.

After all they come with the guarantee of the market return less fees paid.

The big problem is timing – none of us have the luxury of 100 years exposure to the market. 

This leaves the investor with a simple choice of taking a one in four chance of finding an active manager that can add value to their portfolio or choosing the index with a return of the market less fees of between 18-75 basis points.

This is reflected over 10 years assuming an investment of $50,000 and a market return of 10 per cent per annum (see Table 1).

The value lost by the passive investor could total as much as $23,811.

Over the past 10 years 33 per cent of the all Australia Equity Large Cap Funds outperformed the ASX 300 Index, but only 13 per cent outperformed by more than 1 per cent.

Importantly though, the downside would have been limited, with more than 55 per cent of the funds outperforming the index minus 0.50 per cent.

If the potential for active managers to get it wrong is not nearly as big as we thought, why are investors still settling for a return of less than 0.50 per cent?

One of the main reasons is that it allows them to “sleep easy”. After all they don’t have to wait anxiously to see the returns their manager has delivered against the benchmark.

Managers can address these concerns by doing a few things and doing them well.

Unfortunately the investment industry has favoured short-term product proliferation to accelerate their distribution efforts, resulting in an ever-growing array of funds.

This has made it even more difficult for investors to decide.

In an experiment conducted by Agnew and Szykman for their report in 2004, participants were asked to choose from a possible list of investment funds and were then randomly assigned a list of 6 or 60 funds.

Those with the shorter list reported higher satisfaction levels with their decision compared to those who had to choose from the longer list. 

While this may indicate that the excessive choice of funds on the Australian market may be a problem, it shouldn’t be the reason investors don’t seek out good managers at the expense of settling for safe but sub-average returns.

Instead, investors should be spending more time researching managers who actively pursue the investors’ best interests by delivering returns over long periods and who stay true to their investment principles.

Johan de Lange is the head of retail at Allan Gray Australia.

Tags: Asset AllocationAustralian EquitiesCentFunds ManagementInvestors

Related Posts

Betashares fixed income ETF hits $1bn milestone

by Staff
December 16, 2025

A strong demand for core fixed income solutions has seen the Betashares Australian Composite Bond ETF surpass $1 billion in...

Vanguard giant leads ETF decline in November

by Laura Dew
December 12, 2025

Total monthly ETF inflows declined by 28 per cent from highs in November with Vanguard’s $21bn Australian Shares ETF faring...

Schroders expands fixed income management team

by Laura Dew
December 12, 2025

Schroders has appointed a fund manager to its $6.9 billion fixed income team who joins from Macquarie Asset Management.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

VIEW ALL
Promoted Content

Consistency is the most underrated investment strategy.

In financial markets, excitement drives headlines. Equity markets rise, fall, and recover — creating stories that capture attention. Yet sustainable...

by Industry Expert
November 5, 2025
Promoted Content

Jonathan Belz – Redefining APAC Access to US Private Assets

Winner of Executive of the Year – Funds Management 2025After years at Goldman Sachs and Credit Suisse, Jonathan Belz founded...

by Staff Writer
September 11, 2025
Promoted Content

Real-Time Settlement Efficiency in Modern Crypto Wealth Management

Cryptocurrency liquidity has become a cornerstone of sophisticated wealth management strategies, with real-time settlement capabilities revolutionizing traditional investment approaches. The...

by PartnerArticle
September 4, 2025
Editorial

Relative Return: How fixed income got its defensiveness back

In this episode of Relative Return, host Laura Dew chats with Roy Keenan, co-head of fixed income at Yarra Capital...

by Laura Dew
September 4, 2025

Join our newsletter

View our privacy policy, collection notice and terms and conditions to understand how we use your personal information.

Podcasts

Relative Return Insider: RBA holds, Fed cuts and Santa’s set to rally

December 11, 2025

Relative Return Insider: GDP rebounds and housing squeeze getting worse

December 5, 2025

Relative Return Insider: US shares rebound, CPI spikes and super investment

November 28, 2025

Relative Return Insider: Economic shifts, political crossroads, and the digital future

November 14, 2025

Relative Return: Helping Australians retire with confidence

November 11, 2025

Relative Return Insider: RBA holds rates steady amid inflation concerns

November 6, 2025

Top Performing Funds

FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Fund name
3 y p.a(%)
1
DomaCom DFS Mortgage
211.38
2
Loftus Peak Global Disruption Fund Hedged
110.90
3
SGH Income Trust Dis AUD
80.01
4
Global X 21Shares Bitcoin ETF
76.11
5
Smarter Money Long-Short Credit Investor USD
67.63
Money Management provides accurate, informative and insightful editorial coverage of the Australian financial services market, with topics including taxation, managed funds, property investments, shares, risk insurance, master trusts, superannuation, margin lending, financial planning, portfolio construction, and investment strategies.

Subscribe to our newsletter

View our privacy policy, collection notice and terms and conditions to understand how we use your personal information.

About Us

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Collection Notice
  • Privacy Policy

Popular Topics

  • Financial Planning
  • Funds Management
  • Investment Insights
  • ETFs
  • People & Products
  • Policy & Regulation
  • Superannuation

© 2025 All Rights Reserved. All content published on this site is the property of Prime Creative Media. Unauthorised reproduction is prohibited

No Results
View All Results
NEWSLETTER
  • News
    • All News
    • Accounting
    • Financial Planning
    • Funds Management
    • Life/Risk
    • People & Products
    • Policy & Regulation
    • Property
    • SMSF
    • Superannuation
    • Tech
  • Investment
    • All Investment
    • Australian Equities
    • ETFs
    • Fixed Income
    • Global Equities
    • Managed Accounts
  • Features
    • All Features
    • Editorial
    • Expert Analysis
    • Guides
    • Outsider
    • Rate The Raters
    • Top 100
  • Media
    • Events
    • Podcast
    • Webcasts
  • Promoted Content
  • Investment Centre
  • Expert Resources
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

© 2025 All Rights Reserved. All content published on this site is the property of Prime Creative Media. Unauthorised reproduction is prohibited