X
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact
  • Expert Resources
Get the latest news! Subscribe to the Money Management bulletin
  • News
    • Accounting
    • Financial Planning
    • Funds Management
    • Life/Risk
    • People & Products
    • Policy & Regulation
    • Property
    • SMSF
    • Superannuation
    • Tech
  • Investment
    • Australian Equities
    • Global Equities
    • Managed Accounts
    • Fixed Income
    • ETFs
  • Features
    • Editorial
    • Expert Analysis
    • Guides
    • Outsider
    • Rate The Raters
    • Top 100
  • Media
    • Events
    • Podcast
    • Webcasts
  • Promoted Content
  • Investment Centre
No Results
View All Results
  • News
    • Accounting
    • Financial Planning
    • Funds Management
    • Life/Risk
    • People & Products
    • Policy & Regulation
    • Property
    • SMSF
    • Superannuation
    • Tech
  • Investment
    • Australian Equities
    • Global Equities
    • Managed Accounts
    • Fixed Income
    • ETFs
  • Features
    • Editorial
    • Expert Analysis
    • Guides
    • Outsider
    • Rate The Raters
    • Top 100
  • Media
    • Events
    • Podcast
    • Webcasts
  • Promoted Content
  • Investment Centre
No Results
View All Results
No Results
View All Results
Home News Financial Planning

Advisers debate whether to charge for an initial meeting

by Laura Dew
June 20, 2024
in Financial Planning, News
Reading Time: 5 mins read
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Money Management speaks with five advisers on whether or not they charge for their initial meetings, as Elixir Consulting finds the volume opting to charge has doubled since 2020.

Research from Elixir Consulting in its Advice Operations Research Report 2024 found the number of people with the volume of advisers surveyed who charged for the first meeting was 19 per cent, up from 9 per cent in the previous report in 2020. 

X

The average fee charged for this first meeting was $447, although the largest was $1,500.

Lana Clark, senior consultant at Elixir, said: “While this poses the question that clients place a higher value on the adviser if they are paying for the initial meeting, it also might suggest that advisers are now prioritising time and expertise.

“Additionally, 9 per cent say they take a middle-ground approach, not explicitly charging but incorporating the time into their fees upon client engagement.”

Some respondents ticked “other” which Elixir said covered features such as they have done occasionally, if the client is seeking factual information or if they feel the relationship is unlikely to progress beyond that first meeting.

Adviser experiences

YES: Ronald Pratap, senior financial adviser at RP Wealth Management

“I never used to charge for an initial appointment, but now we’re spending more time on that initial appointment and giving a lot of general advice. Now we have to treat ourselves more like professionals, like a lawyer that charges in 15-minute increments. I don’t do that, but for the first meeting I do charge unless that comes from a referral partner.

“A lot of the time, people that aren’t used to advice are coming through from a website lead or finding me on social media. They’re not going to understand how much financial planning costs. So you’ve got to get them to the point to accept this is how much advice is and why it costs so much. You have to explain the compliance process, how we put the statement of advice together, the time spent on it – but you’re almost preparing yourself for pushback.”

NO: Robert Rich, financial adviser at Unite Wealth 

“Our philosophy has been not to charge for an initial meeting as we are unable to provide any value to clients in a meeting where we are just trying to ‘get to know them’. Charging $0 for a meeting leads to more opportunities in front of clients that we might not have had otherwise.

“We back our skills in the initial meeting to either identify that we’re not able to provide the client with sufficient value, give them some pointers on areas to focus on, and not charge a fee, or identify that there is significant value from going through our process and finding ways to demonstrate it to the prospective clients.”

YES: Josh Lee, director and financial adviser at Link Wealth Group

“I do charge for two reasons: firstly, it can help weed out tyre kickers from wasting your time when they were never wanting to pay for advice in the first place. Secondly, it covers the cost of time if clients go through the initial process and don’t engage. By this stage I would have spent circa three hours with them. 

“I am a big fan [of charging] and think advisers should be doing it if they value their time and services they provide.”

OTHER: James O’Reilly, financial adviser at Northeast Wealth 

“We have a free alignment session which is an ‘are we a fit for one another’ meeting. No advice, no exploring goals etc, just ‘who are you and who are we?’ which is with an adviser. 

“Assuming all good, the next step is that we’ll meet to formally start the process – discuss goals, clarify financial position and outline how we can help. That meeting is $495. Still no advice at this point; if the prospect wants to get advice with us, they will pay a deposit on their quoted advice fee, and we can kick off.”

OTHER: Trish Gregory, financial adviser at Fox & Hare 

“Prospects meet with our member success manager for free first to get an understanding of our work, whether we can help them and which adviser they should see.

“We have started charging for the first meeting with the adviser; the change was really prompted by the amount of first free meetings with the adviser being cancelled and moved last minute. It took significant time for both myself and my admin team to prep for the free meeting, which was a 90-min slot in my diary, and follow-up prep for my team when the prospect wouldn’t provide us with the needed info in a timely manner.

“So we changed to charging a couple of hundred dollars. I don’t think we’ve necessarily had more people come on, but the people that have come through to me have a higher chance of coming on as members as they’re more committed. To a degree, charging the fee has reduced the amount of people just wanting to have a chat, and increased the people who are serious about getting advice.”

 

Tags: Advice FeesElixir ConsultingFeesFinancial Advice

Related Posts

ASIC bans former UGC advice head

by Keith Ford
December 19, 2025

ASIC has banned Louis Van Coppenhagen from providing financial services, controlling an entity that carries on a financial services business or performing any function...

Largest weekly losses of FY25 reported

by Laura Dew
December 19, 2025

There has been a net loss of more than 50 advisers this week as the industry approaches the education pathway...

Two Victorian AZ NGA-backed practices form $10m business

by ShyAnn Arkinstall
December 19, 2025

AZ NGA-backed advice firms, Coastline Advice and Edge Advisory Partners, have announced a merger to form a multi-disciplinary business with $10 million combined...

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

VIEW ALL
Promoted Content

Consistency is the most underrated investment strategy.

In financial markets, excitement drives headlines. Equity markets rise, fall, and recover — creating stories that capture attention. Yet sustainable...

by Industry Expert
November 5, 2025
Promoted Content

Jonathan Belz – Redefining APAC Access to US Private Assets

Winner of Executive of the Year – Funds Management 2025After years at Goldman Sachs and Credit Suisse, Jonathan Belz founded...

by Staff Writer
September 11, 2025
Promoted Content

Real-Time Settlement Efficiency in Modern Crypto Wealth Management

Cryptocurrency liquidity has become a cornerstone of sophisticated wealth management strategies, with real-time settlement capabilities revolutionizing traditional investment approaches. The...

by PartnerArticle
September 4, 2025
Editorial

Relative Return: How fixed income got its defensiveness back

In this episode of Relative Return, host Laura Dew chats with Roy Keenan, co-head of fixed income at Yarra Capital...

by Laura Dew
September 4, 2025

Join our newsletter

View our privacy policy, collection notice and terms and conditions to understand how we use your personal information.

Podcasts

Relative Return Insider: MYEFO, US data and a 2025 wrap up

December 18, 2025

Relative Return Insider: RBA holds, Fed cuts and Santa’s set to rally

December 11, 2025

Relative Return Insider: GDP rebounds and housing squeeze getting worse

December 5, 2025

Relative Return Insider: US shares rebound, CPI spikes and super investment

November 28, 2025

Relative Return Insider: Economic shifts, political crossroads, and the digital future

November 14, 2025

Relative Return: Helping Australians retire with confidence

November 11, 2025

Top Performing Funds

FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Fund name
3 y p.a(%)
1
DomaCom DFS Mortgage
211.38
2
Loftus Peak Global Disruption Fund Hedged
110.90
3
SGH Income Trust Dis AUD
80.01
4
Global X 21Shares Bitcoin ETF
76.11
5
Smarter Money Long-Short Credit Investor USD
67.63
Money Management provides accurate, informative and insightful editorial coverage of the Australian financial services market, with topics including taxation, managed funds, property investments, shares, risk insurance, master trusts, superannuation, margin lending, financial planning, portfolio construction, and investment strategies.

Subscribe to our newsletter

View our privacy policy, collection notice and terms and conditions to understand how we use your personal information.

About Us

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Collection Notice
  • Privacy Policy

Popular Topics

  • Financial Planning
  • Funds Management
  • Investment Insights
  • ETFs
  • People & Products
  • Policy & Regulation
  • Superannuation

© 2025 All Rights Reserved. All content published on this site is the property of Prime Creative Media. Unauthorised reproduction is prohibited

No Results
View All Results
NEWSLETTER
  • News
    • All News
    • Accounting
    • Financial Planning
    • Funds Management
    • Life/Risk
    • People & Products
    • Policy & Regulation
    • Property
    • SMSF
    • Superannuation
    • Tech
  • Investment
    • All Investment
    • Australian Equities
    • ETFs
    • Fixed Income
    • Global Equities
    • Managed Accounts
  • Features
    • All Features
    • Editorial
    • Expert Analysis
    • Guides
    • Outsider
    • Rate The Raters
    • Top 100
  • Media
    • Events
    • Podcast
    • Webcasts
  • Promoted Content
  • Investment Centre
  • Expert Resources
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

© 2025 All Rights Reserved. All content published on this site is the property of Prime Creative Media. Unauthorised reproduction is prohibited