Removing the financial threshold test

6 May 2022
| By Liam Cormican |
image
image
expand image

The financial threshold test should be removed, according to Super Consumers Australia and a leading consumer advocacy lawyer, as measuring net worth is an unreliable indicator of financial literacy.

The financial assets test was based on the assumption that people with a net wealth of $2.5 million or gross income for each of the last years of $250,000, automatically had the high level of financial knowledge required to understand complex products.

The definitions of ‘retail’ and ‘wholesale’ clients in chapter 7 of the Corporations Act 2001 were under review in the Australian Law Reform Commission’s (ALRC) inquiry into the simplification of financial services legislation, falling into the Interim Report A which was tabled to Parliament in November.

Speaking to Money Management, Super Consumers Australia policy manager, Franco Morelli, said: “In the context of high capital city house prices and a maturing superannuation system, a lot of Australians may end up being classified as wholesale investors without necessarily having the knowledge required.

“This test needs to be better aligned with people’s actual financial knowledge and sophistication rather than how much money they have. That will require a broader review of the policy settings.”

Morelli said the first steps towards a more adequate system would require financial thresholds to be increased in line with inflation and pegged to the Consumer Price Index going forward.

Maurice Blackburn principal lawyer, Josh Mennen, agreed the way sophisticated investors or a wholesale investor had been classified had been overly weighted towards their financial metrics.

“And so it really loses its practical benefits and what it ends up meaning is that it gets used as a cover to circumvent disclosure and other regulatory obligations when providing financial services to people who actually need to be protected,” he said.

“And that's been a significant problem. And I've acted for a number of people who have been misclassified in that way.”

In his submission to the ALRC inquiry, Mennen recommended there be regulatory requirements expressly requiring financial service providers to give and document deeper consideration of a consumer’s financial literacy, rather than the test being about the consumer’s income and assets.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

 

Recommended for you

 

MARKET INSIGHTS

sub-bg sidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

Squeaky'21

My view is that after 2026 there will be quite a bit less than 10,000 'advisers' (investment advisers) and less than 100...

1 week 1 day ago
Jason Warlond

Dugald makes a great point that not everyone's definition of green is the same and gives a good example. Funds have bee...

1 week 1 day ago
Jasmin Jakupovic

How did they get the AFSL in the first place? Given the green light by ASIC. This is terrible example of ASIC's incompet...

1 week 2 days ago

AustralianSuper and Australian Retirement Trust have posted the financial results for the 2022–23 financial year for their combined 5.3 million members....

9 months 2 weeks ago

A $34 billion fund has come out on top with a 13.3 per cent return in the last 12 months, beating out mega funds like Australian Retirement Trust and Aware Super. ...

9 months ago

The verdict in the class action case against AMP Financial Planning has been delivered in the Federal Court by Justice Moshinsky....

9 months 2 weeks ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND