Staying ahead of the shift from greed to fear

24 September 2021
| By Liam Cormican |
image
image
expand image

Those engaged in active quantitative equity should focus on keeping a balance between four key forces — value, sentiment, quality, and risk, according to State Street.

According to Olivia Engel, global chief investment officer, strong performance in one or more of these areas could justify maintaining a position in a crowded trade, even when performance was weaker in other areas.

“Staying ahead of the shift from greed to fear is not easy (although finding a way to do so will only become more important as global liquidity adjusts to a more normal environment). Greed periods often last a long time, as the market steadily prices in information. But fear takes shape quickly,” she said.

“In general, crowded trades exhibit a relationship between ultra-high sentiment, poor value, and potentially falling quality.”

“By taking a holistic view of these key market drivers, we strive to reap the rewards of crowded trades while staying ahead of the potential shift to fear.”

Starting with the marine transport industry, which saw a rise of 215% this year and was topical in light of Australia, Engel said State Street’s model continued to favour these stocks from a sentiment and quality perspective but less so from a value perspective – and market risks were rising which required monitoring.

While in the world of semiconductors, which had already risen 62% in 2021 and was waiting for the construction of further factories, Engel said the firm’s models continued to support trading in this space because of highly favourable quality and sentiment scores.

And in the Chinese consumer discretionary space, which fell 13% this year, Engel said State Street was opting to not become a buyer as valuation metrics for most of these stocks were still twice that of the overall MSCI China index.

“At the margin, this segment is certainly getting less crowded, but valuation metrics for most of these stocks are still twice that of the overall MSCI China — especially the large-cap names that are under regulatory scrutiny. We like the China consumer growth story, but prefer names in the less crowded, small-cap segments that offer better valuation and better near-term fundamentals”.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

 

Recommended for you

 

MARKET INSIGHTS

sub-bg sidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

JOHN GILLIES

Might be a bit different to i the past where at most there was one man from the industry on the loaded enquiry boards a...

1 day 7 hours ago
Simon

Who get's the $10M? Where does the money go?? Might it end up in the CSLR to financially assist duped investors??? ...

6 days 3 hours ago
Squeaky'21

My view is that after 2026 there will be quite a bit less than 10,000 'advisers' (investment advisers) and less than 100...

1 week 6 days ago

AustralianSuper and Australian Retirement Trust have posted the financial results for the 2022–23 financial year for their combined 5.3 million members....

9 months 2 weeks ago

A $34 billion fund has come out on top with a 13.3 per cent return in the last 12 months, beating out mega funds like Australian Retirement Trust and Aware Super. ...

9 months 1 week ago

The verdict in the class action case against AMP Financial Planning has been delivered in the Federal Court by Justice Moshinsky....

9 months 2 weeks ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND