Westpac leads fees-for-no-service compensation
Westpac has paid or offered to pay out the most compensation for fees-for-no-service misconduct since 2016, according to figures from the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC).
Six of Australia’s largest banking and financial services institutions have paid or offered $1.86 billion in compensation to customers who suffered loss due to misconduct or non-compliant advice.
Compensation payments made or offered by the institution as at 30 June 2021
Institution |
Fees for no service misconduct |
Non-compliant advice |
||
|
Compensation paid or offered |
No. of customers |
Compensation paid |
No. of customers |
Westpac |
$578,441,530 |
71,498 |
$51,684,367 |
3001 |
NAB |
$556,144,345 |
677,531 |
80,002,139 |
2183 |
AMP |
$230,418,976 |
225,513 |
$38,892,310 |
2961 |
CBA |
$169,311,920 |
57,930 |
$9,354,027 |
626 |
ANZ |
$96,969,608 |
32,916 |
$44,700,475 |
2123 |
Macquarie |
$4,628,000 |
1,105 |
- |
- |
Total |
$1,635,914,379 |
1,066,493 |
$224,633,318 |
10,894 |
Source: ASIC
AMP, ANZ, CBA, Macquarie, NAB and Westpac undertook the review and remediation programs to compensate affected customers because of two major ASIC reviews.
ASIC commenced the reviews to investigate:
- The extent of failure by the institutions to deliver ongoing advice services to financial advice customers who were paying fees to receive those services; and
- How effectively the institutions supervised their financial advisers to identify and deal with ‘non-compliant advice’.
Recommended for you
ASIC now has a 1:1 ratio when it comes to court success in the enforcement of crypto activities and more action is expected as Treasury seeks to introduce a regulatory framework.
A leading governance body has hit out at “specialist interest groups proposing ad hoc law reform” when it comes to reforms of financial services legislation and believes an independent body is needed.
The release of ALRC’s final report into financial services legislation has highlighted financial advice as a “significant” focus as it seeks to reduce costs and help advisers understand their obligations, alongside the Quality of Advice Review.
With several financial services firms looking to implement AI into their business, the federal government is examining introducing mandatory guardrails to ensure it can be a global leader in responsible AI.