Make ongoing advice as affordable as a mobile phone

19 January 2021
| By Mike |
image
image
expand image

Ongoing financial advice support fees must become as low cost as a mobile phone with a five-year service support contract, according to a practicing financial adviser based in Western Australia.

The adviser has claimed that moving to a five yearly informed consent arrangements had the potential to see administrative costs across the industry fall from $28 million to only $5.6 million a year.

Utilising a submission to the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) affordable advice review, Roxburgh Securities senior adviser, Steve Blizard has also called for the real of the financial advice opt-in requirements or, failing that, an amendment to make it less frequent.

“Annual opt-in creates extra red tape and forces advisers to only consider ongoing fee arrangements (OFAs with clients who are able to pay them enough so that they can deliver enough ongoing services to a client in a year to get them to actively opt-in,” his submission said.

And amid suggestions that ASIC is focused on scaled advice as a means of driving down advice costs, Blizard’s submission has attacked intra-fund advice claiming that most MySuper superannuation fund members had no idea “that they are paying over $100 million per annum in ongoing personal advice fees to 1,000 intra-fund personal financial advisers, none of whom are required to obtain annual renewals for their ongoing remuneration”.

“Intra-fund advice is being marketed as ‘free’, when in reality the fund member is paying for that advice through increased administration fees in their super fund,” Blizard’s submission claimed. “Some wealth super fund members take advantage of this cross-subsidised intrafund advice, subsidised by millions of other fund members, who never receive advice.”

He claimed that intra-fund adviser numbers had tripled over the past three years, whereas retail adviser numbers had fallen dramatically.

“Unaligned retail financial advisers now suffer an unlevel playing field, with default super fund product manufacturers and their intra-fund personal advisers permitted to manage any vertically integrated conflicts of interest, whereas, retail advisers are not,” Blizard’s submission said.

He said that collective fees should not be charged to default super fund members unless the fund trustee obtained annual consent for these advice fees charged from their fund.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

 

Recommended for you

 

MARKET INSIGHTS

sub-bg sidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

JOHN GILLIES

Might be a bit different to i the past where at most there was one man from the industry on the loaded enquiry boards a...

1 day 5 hours ago
Simon

Who get's the $10M? Where does the money go?? Might it end up in the CSLR to financially assist duped investors??? ...

6 days ago
Squeaky'21

My view is that after 2026 there will be quite a bit less than 10,000 'advisers' (investment advisers) and less than 100...

1 week 6 days ago

AustralianSuper and Australian Retirement Trust have posted the financial results for the 2022–23 financial year for their combined 5.3 million members....

9 months 2 weeks ago

A $34 billion fund has come out on top with a 13.3 per cent return in the last 12 months, beating out mega funds like Australian Retirement Trust and Aware Super. ...

9 months 1 week ago

The verdict in the class action case against AMP Financial Planning has been delivered in the Federal Court by Justice Moshinsky....

9 months 2 weeks ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND