ASIC insurance inside super report reveals ‘confused and overwhelmed’ members

20 November 2020
| By Mike |
image
image
expand image

The usability of insurance inside superannuation has been marked down by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) with the regulator releasing a consumer research report which reported a third of people found it complex and difficult. 

The findings of the research has been published in ASIC Report 673 which pointed to the better understanding of those who obtained insurance via a financial adviser. 

Where insurance inside superannuation was concerned, it stated that: “After interacting with their fund, about a third of the participants spontaneously reported that they felt confused, overwhelmed or uncertain”.  

“They found insurance complex and difficult. Some discovered information they did not understand or did not know how to respond to. This often caused them to delay in engaging further with their fund on insurance after their initial interaction,” the ASIC analysis of the report said. 

“The research highlights some challenges for trustees, such as those associated with providing more tailored information for members. At the same time, there is an opportunity for trustees to significantly improve their members’ experience by improving communication to members about insurance, including on their websites,” ASIC said. 

It said many of the problems members experienced may have been reduced or avoided if the information they sought was easy to find, clear and balanced. 

“Superannuation trustees are encouraged to consider the issues raised in this report and how they might improve the experience of their members when they seek to engage about insurance,” the report said. 

The report, undertaken by Susanbell Research, found that “some members expressed a need for something beyond straight factual information but they did not use the term advice or consider that they needed a financial adviser”. 

“They called it an ‘independent take’, a ‘review’, or asked for ‘specific’ information that was relevant to their personal circumstances – for example how much cover to have at a certain life stage.” 

“In our view, these members had only a vague idea about how superannuation funds give information or provide advice and did not appear to understand the demarcation between the two. When they did not receive the guidance they expected, they were left disappointed and unsure what to do next.” 

AUTHOR

 

Recommended for you

 

MARKET INSIGHTS

sub-bg sidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

Squeaky'21

My view is that after 2026 there will be quite a bit less than 10,000 'advisers' (investment advisers) and less than 100...

5 days 21 hours ago
Jason Warlond

Dugald makes a great point that not everyone's definition of green is the same and gives a good example. Funds have bee...

5 days 22 hours ago
Jasmin Jakupovic

How did they get the AFSL in the first place? Given the green light by ASIC. This is terrible example of ASIC's incompet...

6 days 21 hours ago

AustralianSuper and Australian Retirement Trust have posted the financial results for the 2022–23 financial year for their combined 5.3 million members....

9 months 1 week ago

A $34 billion fund has come out on top with a 13.3 per cent return in the last 12 months, beating out mega funds like Australian Retirement Trust and Aware Super. ...

9 months ago

The verdict in the class action case against AMP Financial Planning has been delivered in the Federal Court by Justice Moshinsky....

9 months 1 week ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND