Crypto rep charged by ASIC
Former cryptocurrency promoter, John Bigatton, has been charged by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) with operating an unregistered managed investment scheme (MIS).
Bigatton, of Carrs Park, New South Wales, was charged with one count of operating an unregistered MIS, one count of providing unlicensed financial services on behalf of another person and four counts of making a false or misleading statement affecting market participation.
He promoted online cryptocurrency platform BitConnect from around 14 August, 2017, to 18 January, 2018 before its collapse in early 2018. It was estimated the platform had a market cap of US$2.5 billion ($3.4 billion).
He also operated an unregistered MIS known as the BitConnect Lending Platform and provided unlicensed financial advice at seminars conducted around Australia.
ASIC acknowledged the help of domestic and international law enforcement counterparts for their help in the investigation, including the Federal Bureau of Investigation.
The matter was first mentioned in the Downing Centre Local Court on 17 November, 2020 and adjourned for further mention on 2 February, 2021. It was being prosecuted by the Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions after a referral from ASIC.
He had previously been banned from providing financial services for seven years in September 2020.
AUTHOR
Laura Dew
Recommended for you
Government has introduced a bill to Parliament to legislate the first stream of the QAR reforms.
ASIC now has a 1:1 ratio when it comes to court success in the enforcement of crypto activities and more action is expected as Treasury seeks to introduce a regulatory framework.
A leading governance body has hit out at “specialist interest groups proposing ad hoc law reform” when it comes to reforms of financial services legislation and believes an independent body is needed.
The release of ALRC’s final report into financial services legislation has highlighted financial advice as a “significant” focus as it seeks to reduce costs and help advisers understand their obligations, alongside the Quality of Advice Review.
