Investment industry failing to learn from experience

6 August 2020
| By Oksana Patron |
image
image
expand image

The investment industry should follow the example of aircraft industry’s structured-learning environments as it is failing to learn from its own experience when it comes to improving its investment committees (IC) practices and governance.

The research from not-for-profit group the Thinking Ahead Institute “Going from good to great” found that in case of the aircraft industry learning from experience and errors increased safety enormously and gave birth to innovations such as checklists to improve decision making and dashboards for tracking mission-critical issues.

According to co-founder of the Thinking Ahead Institute, Roger Urwin, large asset owners were using advanced best-practice governance to unlock the complexities of modern investment, notably when dealing with environmental, social and governance (ESG) considerations.

“Retaining a strategic focus is vital for effective board governance and doubly important for investment committees, where there is often a temptation to get lost in the weeds. Key to this discipline is having an effective chairperson," Urwin said.

“This leadership role is crucial in terms of setting and managing overall strategic direction, facilitating the contributions from all committee members and extracting all the benefits of a strong culture.”

The Institute suggested that taking an IC from good to great outcomes would be doable with strong leadership and an ambitious strategy and it identified key areas where they could make the biggest gains:

  • Getting the right people on the IC ‘bus’ is critical, especially in the areas of competency, teamwork and accountability;
  • Exploiting the opportunities for improved efficiency and collective intelligence, notably: extending the chair role; building the IC teamwork; pinpointing its comparative advantages; restyling the IC process; and developing a richer culture; and
  • Taking the opportunities this crisis presents, starting with exercising more innovative thinking and practice in the conduct of IC meetings, and applying more innovative thinking to the challenges of the future.

“Could investment committees and boards set their sights higher? Absolutely they could. The stakes are too high for them not to take this path. And these current pressurised circumstances make such steps attractive right now,” Urwin said.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

 

Recommended for you

 

MARKET INSIGHTS

sub-bg sidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

Squeaky'21

My view is that after 2026 there will be quite a bit less than 10,000 'advisers' (investment advisers) and less than 100...

6 days ago
Jason Warlond

Dugald makes a great point that not everyone's definition of green is the same and gives a good example. Funds have bee...

6 days 1 hour ago
Jasmin Jakupovic

How did they get the AFSL in the first place? Given the green light by ASIC. This is terrible example of ASIC's incompet...

1 week ago

AustralianSuper and Australian Retirement Trust have posted the financial results for the 2022–23 financial year for their combined 5.3 million members....

9 months 1 week ago

A $34 billion fund has come out on top with a 13.3 per cent return in the last 12 months, beating out mega funds like Australian Retirement Trust and Aware Super. ...

9 months ago

The verdict in the class action case against AMP Financial Planning has been delivered in the Federal Court by Justice Moshinsky....

9 months 1 week ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND