LIC stamping fee exemption to be extended
The ban on conflicted remuneration to listed investment companies (LICs) will be extended following a consultation by the Treasury, removing an impediment to the Financial Advisers Standards and Ethics Authority (FASEA) exam extension legislation.
This followed a public consultation initiated by Treasurer Josh Frydenberg on the merits of the stamping fee exemption in relation to LICs which began in January, 2020.
The Labor Party had wanted to debate the LIC issues, which were part of an omnibus bill which included the FASEA extension.
While the Treasury acknowledged LIC capital raisings ‘had largely ceased’ since COVID-19, the Government said it was important the ban was extended ahead of any resumption in capital raising activity and clarity would address any risk of consumer harm.
Frydenberg said: “Clarifying these arrangements will address any related risk of consumer harm and ensure that stockbrokers, financial advisers and investment managers are clear about the regulatory settings that will apply in this area and investors can continue to invest with confidence in these products.
“Extending the ban on conflicted remuneration to LICs will address risks associated with the potential mis-selling of these products to retail consumers, improve competitive neutrality in the funds management industry and provide long term certainty so that this segment of Australia’s capital markets can continue to operate effectively and provide investors with opportunities to diversify their investments.”
Equity and debt securities in trading companies, real estate investment trusts and listed infrastructure investments were unaffected by the changes.
The arrangements would be monitored by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission.
AUTHOR
Laura Dew
Recommended for you
Government has introduced a bill to Parliament to legislate the first stream of the QAR reforms.
ASIC now has a 1:1 ratio when it comes to court success in the enforcement of crypto activities and more action is expected as Treasury seeks to introduce a regulatory framework.
A leading governance body has hit out at “specialist interest groups proposing ad hoc law reform” when it comes to reforms of financial services legislation and believes an independent body is needed.
The release of ALRC’s final report into financial services legislation has highlighted financial advice as a “significant” focus as it seeks to reduce costs and help advisers understand their obligations, alongside the Quality of Advice Review.
