Faced by ASIC questioning ISA changes its early access super calculations

13 May 2020
| By Mike |
image
image
expand image

In the face of a formal letter from the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) Industry funds advocacy group Industry Super Australia (ISA) has changed its modelling around the impact of people obtaining early access to superannuation.

Just days out from ISA executives being forced to front a Parliamentary Committee, ASIC has revealed it wrote to Industry Super Australia late last month “asking questions about the modelling underlying their estimates of the impact of early release of superannuation on retirement balances”.

However, ASIC has yet to decide what, if anything, it is going to do about ISA.

ASIC said that in its letter to ISA, the regulator had “expressed concern that the ISA modelling did not follow all of the principles that ASIC articulated in a frequently asked question published on ASIC’s website on 16 April, 2020: How should trustees communicate the potential long-term impacts of the COVID-19 early release of superannuation scheme on retirement balances?”.

“Contrary to the ASIC principles, the ISA modelling did not use the same assumptions as the generic calculator on the ISA website. (The ASIC principles are intended to assist trustees by describing how they might minimise their risk of providing misleading disclosure. It is important to note that they do not have the force of law and estimates are not misleading merely because they do not comply with the ASIC principles.),” the ASIC answer said.

“On 4 May ISA responded to ASIC’s letter stating that it had reviewed its early release modelling and website calculators and that, as a result of that review, it would make changes to the assumptions used in its early release modelling and website calculators,” it said.

“ASIC is reviewing ISA’s changes and will then consider its next steps,” ASIC’s answer said.

However in a positive note for ISA, ASIC said it had noted that contrary to the original evidence provided to the COVID-19 Senate Select Committee by Treasury official, Robert Jeremenko, the ISA estimates were “in real, rather than nominal dollars and this is not the focus of ASIC’s engagement with ISA on this matter”.

Both ISA executives and those from industry funds-owned bank, ME Bank, have been directed to attend a special hearing of the House of Representatives Standing Committee on Economics this week.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

 

Recommended for you

 

MARKET INSIGHTS

sub-bg sidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

Squeaky'21

My view is that after 2026 there will be quite a bit less than 10,000 'advisers' (investment advisers) and less than 100...

5 days 23 hours ago
Jason Warlond

Dugald makes a great point that not everyone's definition of green is the same and gives a good example. Funds have bee...

6 days ago
Jasmin Jakupovic

How did they get the AFSL in the first place? Given the green light by ASIC. This is terrible example of ASIC's incompet...

6 days 23 hours ago

AustralianSuper and Australian Retirement Trust have posted the financial results for the 2022–23 financial year for their combined 5.3 million members....

9 months 1 week ago

A $34 billion fund has come out on top with a 13.3 per cent return in the last 12 months, beating out mega funds like Australian Retirement Trust and Aware Super. ...

9 months ago

The verdict in the class action case against AMP Financial Planning has been delivered in the Federal Court by Justice Moshinsky....

9 months 1 week ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND