ASIC commences proceedings against Mayfair

7 April 2020
| By Chris Dastoor |
image
image
expand image

The Australian Securities and Investments Commission has commenced proceedings in the Federal Court of Australia against Mayfair 101 and Mayfair Platinum for misleading or deceptive advertising.

It had promoted two debenture products to wholesale investors: M Plus Fixed Income Notes, which were unsecured promissory notes issued by M101 Holdings; and M Core Fixed Income Notes, which were secured promissory notes.

Mayfair used sponsored link internet advertising through Google AdWords and Bing Ads, so the websites appeared as sponsored links when consumers searched for ‘bank term deposit’ or ‘term deposit’.

Other promotional material also used key words and phrases such as term deposit alternative, term investment, fixed term, certainty, confidence and capital growth.

ASIC alleged Mayfair made statements that were false, misleading or deceptive by representing that:

  • Mayfair debenture products are comparable to bank term deposits and have a similar risk profile when they are much riskier;
  • The principal investment would be repaid in full on maturity, when investors may not receive capital repayments on maturity or at all because Mayfair could elect to extend the time for repayment for an indefinite period;
  • The products were specifically designed for people seeking safe investments, when these carried significant risk; and
  • The products provided capital growth opportunities when they do not.

ASIC sought injunctions to restrain the publication of statements like this and pecuniary penalties in relation to the alleged false or misleading representations.

On 11 March, 2020, Mayfair Platinum suspended payment of capital redemptions to investors in the Mayfair debenture products due to liquidity issues.

ASIC also sought an interim injunction to stop the defendants from promoting and issuing the Mayfair debenture products while redemptions to existing investors remain suspended.

The injunction would be heard by the Federal Court on 14 April 2020 at 9.30am.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

 

Recommended for you

 

MARKET INSIGHTS

sub-bg sidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

Squeaky'21

My view is that after 2026 there will be quite a bit less than 10,000 'advisers' (investment advisers) and less than 100...

4 days 17 hours ago
Jason Warlond

Dugald makes a great point that not everyone's definition of green is the same and gives a good example. Funds have bee...

4 days 18 hours ago
Jasmin Jakupovic

How did they get the AFSL in the first place? Given the green light by ASIC. This is terrible example of ASIC's incompet...

5 days 17 hours ago

AustralianSuper and Australian Retirement Trust have posted the financial results for the 2022–23 financial year for their combined 5.3 million members....

9 months 1 week ago

A $34 billion fund has come out on top with a 13.3 per cent return in the last 12 months, beating out mega funds like Australian Retirement Trust and Aware Super. ...

8 months 4 weeks ago

The verdict in the class action case against AMP Financial Planning has been delivered in the Federal Court by Justice Moshinsky....

9 months 1 week ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND