SuperRatings to APRA on heatmaps – WHY?

12 December 2019
| By Mike |
image
image
expand image

The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) needs to explain why it is collecting, interpreting and then publishing information in the public domain around superannuation heatmaps because it shouldn’t be, according to the founder of SuperRatings, Jeff Bresnahan.

Bresnahan has reacted to the release of the heatmaps by suggesting that instead of regulating, APRA was now “trying to play the shame game”.

“But there is a real risk that some of those shamed will be the wrong funds,” he said. “The problem is that no one in the industry wants to tell the regulator that they have got it wrong.”

Bresnahan claimed that, effectively, APRA was putting into circulation data which analysed just parts of a superannuation but not the whole.

“By ignoring things like governance, advice, insurance and member servicing structures, consumers are not being provided with the whole picture,” he said.

Further he claimed that while conflicts of interest were identified as a major issue in superannuation during the Royal Commission, it seemed ironic that APRA had deliberately avoided reporting any measurement of a fund’s governance structure.

Bresnahan said that in an industry which carries inherently conflicted directors, “it would appear that governance had been ignored in favour of more easily assessable information” and questioned whether such omissions might create legal liabilities for APRA in the future.

The SuperRatings founder said APRA was entering unchartered territory and that it was not the first time the regulator had got it wrong, referencing APRA’s efforts to produce performance tables which were “flawed from a usefulness perspective, in that they don’t reflect the performance of a super fund’s investment options”.

“And so it continues with the heatmaps,” Bresnahan clamed. “Having reviewed the heatmap methodology, SuperRatings is of the opinion that their release into the public domain may create more questions than they answer and that consumers could well be influenced into products that are inappropriate for them.”

Read more about:

AUTHOR

 

Recommended for you

 

MARKET INSIGHTS

sub-bg sidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

Avenue 17

I apologise, but, in my opinion, you are not right. I am assured. Let's discuss it. Write to me in PM, we will communica...

9 hours ago
Robert Segue

Sounds like a schoolyard childish scrap! take it behind the shelter sheds and sort it out! Really Publicly listed compa...

1 day 9 hours ago
JOHN GILLIES

iN THE END IT IS THE REGULATORS FAULT. wHILE I WAS WORKING I WAS ALLWAYS AMAZED AT HOW UNTHINKING SOME CLIENTS WERE! I...

1 day 13 hours ago

AustralianSuper and Australian Retirement Trust have posted the financial results for the 2022–23 financial year for their combined 5.3 million members....

9 months 2 weeks ago

A $34 billion fund has come out on top with a 13.3 per cent return in the last 12 months, beating out mega funds like Australian Retirement Trust and Aware Super. ...

9 months 1 week ago

The verdict in the class action case against AMP Financial Planning has been delivered in the Federal Court by Justice Moshinsky....

9 months 2 weeks ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND