ASIC admits increased risk of litigation failures
The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has openly admitted that the risk of it not succeeding when it pursues litigation has increased because of its changed strategy around “if not, why not litigate”.
In an answer to a question on notice from Senate Estimates, the regulator said more court action could be expected to be taken by ASIC and that it believed recent Government legislative changes had it in a stronger position to do so.
However, it said there were no guarantees as to outcomes, notwithstanding he fact that it had a 90% litigation success rate over the past five years.
“Given ASIC’s ‘Why Not Litigate’ approach to enforcement, more court litigation is expected to be taken by ASIC,” it said. “In addition, the Treasury Laws Amendment (Strengthening Corporate and Financial Sector Penalties) Act 2019 puts ASIC in a stronger position to pursue significant civil penalties and criminal sanctions against those who breach the law.”
“These changes are expected to mean more litigation against large and well-resourced institutions and in relation to new and existing laws that now carry penalties,” the regulator said.
However, ASIC acknowledged that this would “this will mean an increase in the complexity and uncertainty of ASIC litigation”.
“It can be expected as a consequence that ASIC’s litigation risk, including the risk of not succeeding in its court actions, will increase,” it said.
“ASIC’s enforcement litigation success rate has been above 90% for the five years to 2018-2019. ASIC does not make decisions about litigation lightly. It recognises its responsibility to use those resources for the public good, meaning that it the litigation it commences must be based on sufficient evidence and of benefit to the public in pursuing it.”
Recommended for you
Government has introduced a bill to Parliament to legislate the first stream of the QAR reforms.
ASIC now has a 1:1 ratio when it comes to court success in the enforcement of crypto activities and more action is expected as Treasury seeks to introduce a regulatory framework.
A leading governance body has hit out at “specialist interest groups proposing ad hoc law reform” when it comes to reforms of financial services legislation and believes an independent body is needed.
The release of ALRC’s final report into financial services legislation has highlighted financial advice as a “significant” focus as it seeks to reduce costs and help advisers understand their obligations, alongside the Quality of Advice Review.
