Beware poor ESG in passive funds

23 August 2019
| By Laura Dew |
image
image
expand image

Investors in passive emerging markets funds need to be wary of being invested in companies with poor environmental and social governance standards (ESG), according to Stewart Investors manager Jack Nelson.

Opting for an index or exchange traded fund (ETF) meant investors followed the benchmark which could typically contain large multi-nationals which did not always adhere to the best standards.

Nelson, who manages the Stewart Investors Wholesale Global Emerging Markets Sustainability fund, said: “It is difficult to screen for quality companies in a passive fund. Without taking an active approach then you can end up misallocated into bad companies.”

Many of the companies that scored poorly from an ESG perspective were state-owned enterprises, those companies where the state was the majority shareholder, a practice that was particularly big in countries such as Brazil, China and South Africa.

This state ownership then led to a misalignment between the strategic interest of the state and those of minority shareholders. However, they generally tended to have lower risk than the wider market as they were backed by the government and had higher dividend yields.

Nelson said financial and resources companies were also sectors which tended to score poorly on ESG standards.

Emerging market companies tended to score lower overall than their developed market counterparts on factors such as board, ownership and control and pay and accounting practices.

This was worsened, Nelson said, by the fact there was often limited corporate transparency or disclosure at emerging market companies which made them harder for managers to assess.

“There have been issues of corruption, the interactions between management and politicians can undo businesses and we have seen that repeatedly over the years. Also resources companies have had environmental disasters which make us wary,” he said.

“We are trying to find high quality companies run by people we can trust, which are resilient to change and financed in a conservative way.”

The Stewart Investors Wholesale Global Emerging Markets Sustainability fund has returned 9.1 per cent over one year to 19 August, according to FE Analytics, versus returns of 6.4 per cent by the ACS Equity-Emerging Markets sector.

 

Read more about:

AUTHOR

 

Recommended for you

 

MARKET INSIGHTS

sub-bg sidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

Squeaky'21

My view is that after 2026 there will be quite a bit less than 10,000 'advisers' (investment advisers) and less than 100...

1 week 1 day ago
Jason Warlond

Dugald makes a great point that not everyone's definition of green is the same and gives a good example. Funds have bee...

1 week 1 day ago
Jasmin Jakupovic

How did they get the AFSL in the first place? Given the green light by ASIC. This is terrible example of ASIC's incompet...

1 week 2 days ago

AustralianSuper and Australian Retirement Trust have posted the financial results for the 2022–23 financial year for their combined 5.3 million members....

9 months 2 weeks ago

A $34 billion fund has come out on top with a 13.3 per cent return in the last 12 months, beating out mega funds like Australian Retirement Trust and Aware Super. ...

9 months ago

The verdict in the class action case against AMP Financial Planning has been delivered in the Federal Court by Justice Moshinsky....

9 months 2 weeks ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND