Last report by Parliamentary Committee backs continuing vertical integration

15 May 2019
| By Mike |
image
image
expand image

In a report tabled well after the proroguing of the Parliament, a key parliamentary committee has rejected legislation which would have substantially ended vertical integration in the financial services industry.

The Senate Economics Legislation Committee rejected the legislation put forward by the Pauline Hanson’s One Nation Party which was aimed at protecting bank deposits by ending vertical integration and therefore eliminating cross-selling.

Hanson had backed the legislation in the Senate with a second reading speech which stated: “The vertical integration of the banks providing additional services including financial advice, insurance and superannuation have been shown to be the root cause of rorts, over charging and profit gouging”.

However, both Government and Labor Party senators rejected the bill with the chair of the committee, Victorian Liberal Senator, Jane Hume stating the committee was confident the current legislative protections “are sufficient to ensure that the money held in bank deposits are safe”.

“In support of that conclusion, the committee notes that during 2008-09, no Australian bank collapsed and no deposits were lost despite the worst financial crisis since the Great Depression of 1929-33,” her report said.

Labor members of the committee also rejected the bill noting that neither the Royal Commission nor the Productivity Commission had recommended any structural separation of the banks.

However, their part of the committee report stated: “Labor Senators are determined to ensure that the banking and financial sector is held to account for their actions wherever there has been misconduct or unethical behaviour” and added that they were focused on implementing the recommendations o the Royal Commission to “deliver lasting, comprehensive change to financial services”.

“Labor will fully implement 75 of the 76 recommendations, and will implement the final recommendation, Recommendation 1.3—Mortgage Broker Remuneration, in a manner that achieves the objectives but without harming competition in the retail mortgage market. We are sticking to our tougher, fairer and faster plan to implement its recommendations,” the Labor Senators said.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

 

Recommended for you

 

MARKET INSIGHTS

sub-bg sidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

Squeaky'21

My view is that after 2026 there will be quite a bit less than 10,000 'advisers' (investment advisers) and less than 100...

4 days 7 hours ago
Jason Warlond

Dugald makes a great point that not everyone's definition of green is the same and gives a good example. Funds have bee...

4 days 8 hours ago
Jasmin Jakupovic

How did they get the AFSL in the first place? Given the green light by ASIC. This is terrible example of ASIC's incompet...

5 days 7 hours ago

AustralianSuper and Australian Retirement Trust have posted the financial results for the 2022–23 financial year for their combined 5.3 million members....

9 months 1 week ago

A $34 billion fund has come out on top with a 13.3 per cent return in the last 12 months, beating out mega funds like Australian Retirement Trust and Aware Super. ...

8 months 4 weeks ago

The verdict in the class action case against AMP Financial Planning has been delivered in the Federal Court by Justice Moshinsky....

9 months 1 week ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND