IPA claims dodgy data underpins ALP’s tax advice changes
The Institute of Public Accountants (IPA) has ramped up its argument that the Australian Labor Party has no justification for attacking the fees charged by accountants for providing tax advice.
In a statement issued today, the IPA chief executive, Andrew Conway, said there had been significant misinformation when it comes to accountants’ fees for providing tax advice.
“The figures used are based on a very small sample. These in themselves do not justify a policy of capping deductions for tax advice,” he said. “In addition, if the numbers being bandied around are using aggregated data, they will result in grossly overstated averages for adviser fees for this sample size.”
Conway said that the ATO data that had been used was related to the 2016-17 financial year and that the label in the income tax return that made up the figures included adviser fees, ATO interest charges and litigation costs.
“From 2018 onwards, we will have a proper breakup of the three components,” he said. “If aggregated figures are being used, then this is misleading the public. It is also misinformation to say that only the rich can access tax deductions; these are accessible by all Australians.”
Conway said that there were already substantial penalties for advisers doing the wrong thing and that it was highly inappropriate to have a universal cap for all taxpayers as circumstances differed and a one-size-fits-all was inequitable.
“Our tax system is complex. Denying deductibility for seeking advice from a trusted adviser is inappropriate,” he said.
Recommended for you
ASIC now has a 1:1 ratio when it comes to court success in the enforcement of crypto activities and more action is expected as Treasury seeks to introduce a regulatory framework.
A leading governance body has hit out at “specialist interest groups proposing ad hoc law reform” when it comes to reforms of financial services legislation and believes an independent body is needed.
The release of ALRC’s final report into financial services legislation has highlighted financial advice as a “significant” focus as it seeks to reduce costs and help advisers understand their obligations, alongside the Quality of Advice Review.
With several financial services firms looking to implement AI into their business, the federal government is examining introducing mandatory guardrails to ensure it can be a global leader in responsible AI.