Industry funds urge no carve-outs for claims handling
Major industry funds body the Australian Institute of Superannuation Trustees (AIST) has strongly opposed carving-out insurance claims handling from the licensing and financial advice rules.
In a submission responding to Government’s move to make insurance claims handling a financial service and therefore remove its exemption under the Corporations Act, the AIST said it strongly supported the removal of the exemption and “accordingly, we also do not support the introduction of more specific carveouts going forward”.
It also made particular reference to the likelihood that precluding such carve-outs would limit the ability of lawyers to chase compensation work.
“The protection of members should take primary precedence,” it said.
“The example of completing member total and invalidity claims forms demonstrates why specific carveouts should not be supported,” the AIST response said. “While seemingly of value to members who are experiencing a difficult time, the current exemption has led to some law firms heavily advertising to undertake such work.”
“Anecdotally, it seems that such law firms may be charging members up to large amounts (e.g.70 per cent) of any benefit which is paid from a superannuation fund. Such undertakings should be licensed, and members provided with adequate protection,” the AIST response said.
“Ultimately, any benefits and products offered by superannuation funds may be explained to members in a factual way (here are the benefits and products offered),” it said. “If a member requires personal advice, such advice should be under the licensing and financial advice rules. This should apply to instances where members are liaising with insurers or the superannuation fund about their total and permanent invalidity claim.”
“Insurance claims handling is a financial service. Accordingly, AIST supports the coverage of provisions to superannuation trustees, and others with a decision-making role over claims, including agents.”
Recommended for you
Government has introduced a bill to Parliament to legislate the first stream of the QAR reforms.
ASIC now has a 1:1 ratio when it comes to court success in the enforcement of crypto activities and more action is expected as Treasury seeks to introduce a regulatory framework.
A leading governance body has hit out at “specialist interest groups proposing ad hoc law reform” when it comes to reforms of financial services legislation and believes an independent body is needed.
The release of ALRC’s final report into financial services legislation has highlighted financial advice as a “significant” focus as it seeks to reduce costs and help advisers understand their obligations, alongside the Quality of Advice Review.
