Call to exclude defined benefit super from product intervention
Defined benefit (DB) superannuation schemes should be exempt from the Government’s proposed new product intervention powers, according to the major industry superannuation fund, UniSuper.
The superannuation fund has used a submission to the Senate Economics Legislation Committee review of the legislation to argue that defined benefit schemes need to be treated equivalently to other default superannuation products such as MySuper.
“Rather than thinking of a DB scheme as a promoter marketing a product, it is better thought of as a trustee managing the deferred remuneration of members (i.e. an entitlement to receive a benefit based on a formula linked back to past service, benefit salary and other relevant factors),” the submission said.
“A DB scheme is, after all, not a product in any conventional sense. In the case of UniSuper’s DB scheme, membership is not open to the general public and it is not distributed in the way conventional financial products are i.e. sold through distribution channels,” the submission said.
“Membership of the DB scheme arises directly as a result being employed in the higher education and research sector. This workplace entitlement, rather than being sold through distribution channels, emanates directly from employment arrangements and the industrial agreements that cover the higher education and research sector.”
The submission said that, further, because UniSuper had no industrial standing in the arrangements, it had limited power to determine who was covered by the agreement.
“The main power UniSuper has is to ensure that our benefit design remains suitable for employees in the sector,” it said. “We submit that this duty is already being met through the exercise of trustee duties under existing governance arrangements applying to the scheme combined with prudential and other regulatory oversight.”
Recommended for you
Government has introduced a bill to Parliament to legislate the first stream of the QAR reforms.
ASIC now has a 1:1 ratio when it comes to court success in the enforcement of crypto activities and more action is expected as Treasury seeks to introduce a regulatory framework.
A leading governance body has hit out at “specialist interest groups proposing ad hoc law reform” when it comes to reforms of financial services legislation and believes an independent body is needed.
The release of ALRC’s final report into financial services legislation has highlighted financial advice as a “significant” focus as it seeks to reduce costs and help advisers understand their obligations, alongside the Quality of Advice Review.
