FASEA’s CPD approach is flawed, says Portfolio Construction Forum

26 September 2018
| By Mike |
image
image
expand image

The Financial Adviser Standards and Ethics Authority’s (FASEA’s) approach to continuing professional development (CPD) is flawed because it is based on the old and inappropriate Regulatory Guide 146 and the selling of financial products, according to education group, Portfolio Construction Forum.

The Forum has used a submission to FASEA on CPD to argue that the CPD regime has to leave the old RG 146 regime in the past and adopt a new, contemporary foundation.

At the same time the submission argues that advisers need to take as much responsibility for CPD as their licensees and is suggesting that the regime being proposed by FASEA “will create conflicts of interest for licensees, while failing to lift standards of continuing education required of an entire emerging profession”.

“The current CPD regime is focused on financial products,” the submission said. “FASEA has a golden opportunity to adopt a more holistic continuing education framework, which supports the evolution of financial advice into a profession. Those who argue for lower standards are simply failing to appreciate what professionalism really means.”

“The Forum believes the Corporations Amendment (Professional Standards of Financial Advisers) Act 2017 is the basis for FASEA to do far more than simply lift professionalism in financial product sales,” it said.

“Indeed, FASEA has an opportunity to build a framework for best practice continuing education (as well as best practice initial education), which aligns with professional financial advice. Such a shift would represent a significant raising of the bar for the sector, which is the overall objective.”

Read more about:

AUTHOR

 

Recommended for you

 

MARKET INSIGHTS

sub-bg sidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

Squeaky'21

My view is that after 2026 there will be quite a bit less than 10,000 'advisers' (investment advisers) and less than 100...

5 days 23 hours ago
Jason Warlond

Dugald makes a great point that not everyone's definition of green is the same and gives a good example. Funds have bee...

6 days ago
Jasmin Jakupovic

How did they get the AFSL in the first place? Given the green light by ASIC. This is terrible example of ASIC's incompet...

6 days 23 hours ago

AustralianSuper and Australian Retirement Trust have posted the financial results for the 2022–23 financial year for their combined 5.3 million members....

9 months 1 week ago

A $34 billion fund has come out on top with a 13.3 per cent return in the last 12 months, beating out mega funds like Australian Retirement Trust and Aware Super. ...

9 months ago

The verdict in the class action case against AMP Financial Planning has been delivered in the Federal Court by Justice Moshinsky....

9 months 1 week ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND