Disclosure docs don’t help people choose better insurance

17 September 2018
| By Nicholas Grove |
image
image
expand image

Government-mandated disclosure doesn’t help people make better purchasing decisions when it comes to insurance, according to a world first experimental study.

Entitled “(In)effective Disclosure: An experimental study of consumers purchasing home contents insurance,” the study, conducted by Monash University Professors Justin Malbon and Harmen Oppewal, examined the effectiveness of home contents product disclosure statements (PDSs) and key fact sheets (KFSs) in assisting consumers to select the best policy that suits their needs.

The study found that: up to 42 per cent of participants chose the worst offer, despite being given the time and opportunity to review the disclosure information.

And when able to choose from three policies, 35 per cent chose the worse policy and only 46 per cent found and selected the best policy.

The study also showed there was no simple and consistent effect of disclosure. In other words, while participants were more likely to forego purchasing an insurance policy when they had only access to the PDS the results did not find a clear pattern of understanding where people were provided more or less disclosure information.

It also showed that purchasing decisions were not affected by the way in which the consumer viewed the disclosure, that is, either via a computer or smart phone.

Professor Oppewal said that the question needs to be asked whether disclosure is an effective tool at all for aiding consumers in choosing an insurance policy.

“Mandated disclosure may serve other purposes … but the findings indicate that even in ideal circumstances, disclosure does not ensure that consumers make better decisions, nor does it help their chances of obtaining suitable insurance cover,” he said.

Professor Malbon said while there is clearly considerable room for improvement in mandated insurance disclosure documents, when people keep making the wrong decision even in the most ideal of circumstances, “you have to wonder if there is a better way”.

“We should consider requiring insurers to offer a standard set of gold, silver and bronze cover across the industry. That way the market can compete on price, and not confound consumers about what is covered and not covered when they make claims under their policy,” Malbon said.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

 

Recommended for you

 

MARKET INSIGHTS

sub-bg sidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

JOHN GILLIES

Might be a bit different to i the past where at most there was one man from the industry on the loaded enquiry boards a...

1 day ago
Simon

Who get's the $10M? Where does the money go?? Might it end up in the CSLR to financially assist duped investors??? ...

5 days 19 hours ago
Squeaky'21

My view is that after 2026 there will be quite a bit less than 10,000 'advisers' (investment advisers) and less than 100...

1 week 5 days ago

AustralianSuper and Australian Retirement Trust have posted the financial results for the 2022–23 financial year for their combined 5.3 million members....

9 months 2 weeks ago

A $34 billion fund has come out on top with a 13.3 per cent return in the last 12 months, beating out mega funds like Australian Retirement Trust and Aware Super. ...

9 months 1 week ago

The verdict in the class action case against AMP Financial Planning has been delivered in the Federal Court by Justice Moshinsky....

9 months 2 weeks ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND