Was ‘fair exchange of value’ fee for no service?
The concept of “fair exchange of value” has been aired at the Royal Commission into Misconduct in the Banking, Superannuation and Financial Services Industry in the context of National Australia Bank (NAB) seeking to retain adviser fees in relation to superannuation fund members not actually receiving advice.
The former chair of the MLC Superannuation trustee, NULIS, Nicole Smith confirmed that a paper had been developed seeking to justify the “fair exchange of value” concept and that this had been opposed by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC).
Under questioning from counsel assisting the commission, Michael Hodge QC, Smith agreed that the concept was based on the banking group agreeing to provide a service and could therefore justify keeping fees.
Smith said she was aware of ASIC’s concerns with respect to the proposition amounting to fee for no service and agreed with ASIC on the issue.
The Royal Commission was told that the issue of “fair exchange of value” was being contemplated within NAB/MLC as recently as late last year and January, this year.
Recommended for you
Sharing his reasoning in joining the FSC board, WT Financial chief executive, Keith Cullen, believes “product and advice cannot be separated” from each other in the current environment.
The Emerge Foundation, a charity run by financial advisers and fund managers, has announced a scholarship program to help veterans transition into tertiary education.
In an open letter, Sequoia chief executive Garry Crole has hit out against shareholders “with a personal axe to grind” as he fights for his job ahead of an EGM.
The JAWG has announced it is in talks with Treasury around five “core principles” to strengthen the education standards for new entrants to the financial advice space.
