High fees don’t always equate to low returns
Superannuation funds ratings house, SuperRatings has disagreed with a draft finding by the Productivity Commission (PC) that higher fees are clearly associated with lower net returns over the long term.
In a submission responding to the PC, SuperRatings said it did not ascribe to the view about higher fees and lower returns, and pointed out that superannuation products levied a variety of fees and charges, “some of which may ultimately add to retirement balances”.
“For a number of providers with a high investment fee, it can be attributed to allocations to higher cost asset classes, which have been a key reason for their consistently strong performance outcomes for members,” it said. “Accordingly, we believe that any analysis of this issue should be focused on the types of fees being incurred by consumers, in particular uncompetitive administration or product charges.”
The SuperRatings submission said that in many instances, these administration or product charges were not expected to add to net investment outcomes but, rather, represented a structural drag on retirement balances.
It said that while SuperRatings agreed with the assertion that members were often better off in lower-fee, better-performing funds, it believed there were clear examples of providers with above median fees, that had strong overall outcomes.
Recommended for you
Financial Services Council chief executive, Blake Briggs, is urging Minister for Financial Services, Stephen Jones, to take advantage of the QAR opportunity to reduce regulatory duplication and ensure advice is affordable.
Former chair of the House of Representatives’ Standing Economics Committee, Tim Wilson, is planning a return to politics after losing his seat in the 2022 federal election.
Morningstar is going to offer research ratings of funds in the $3.5 trillion superannuation sector for the first time in response to demand from financial advisers.
Treasurer Jim Chalmers has opened a consultation into the design of the annual superannuation performance test, canvassing views on a range of reform options.
