SMSF Association calls for clarity about advisers’ prior education

17 July 2018
| By Nicholas Grove |
image
image
expand image

The SMSF Association is urging the Financial Adviser Standards and Ethics Authority (FASEA) to provide more guidance and certainty around how recognised prior learning for existing financial advisers will be implemented as they transition to the new education standards.

SMSF Association head of policy Jordan George said introducing higher education standards for financial advisers has always been a key policy goal for the organisation, but it was essential that advisers have greater clarity and certainty as to how their existing qualifications will count under the new education standards being proposed by FASEA.

In its submission to FASEA “on proposed guidance on education pathways for existing advisers”, the association said advisers who have made every effort to be educated and have completed high-quality education and accreditations should have their efforts to be professional recognised under the FASEA framework.

“Currently, the proposed FASEA education standards for existing advisers do not provide enough recognition for prior learning,” George said.

“A more meaningful recognition of advisers’ prior education should help them in the transition to the new regime with less cost and effort while maintaining the high standards that must be achieved to ensure consumer trust.”

George said the SMSF Association also strongly recommended in its submission that financial advisers who service SMSF trustees should be required to have completed specialised SMSF education.

“We also recommended greater flexibility for new entrants to undertake university study and still be able to enter the financial advice profession. The proposed FASEA pathway for new entrants is too rigid and may starve the industry of future advisers,” he said.

George said the association also raised concerns about accountants giving SMSF advice under a limited license not being adequately considered under the existing pathways framework.

“We are advocating a specific pathway designed for the services they provide rather than having them spend considerable time and money studying subjects that are not relevant to the advice they provide,” he said.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

 

Recommended for you

 

MARKET INSIGHTS

sub-bg sidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

Squeaky'21

My view is that after 2026 there will be quite a bit less than 10,000 'advisers' (investment advisers) and less than 100...

6 days 21 hours ago
Jason Warlond

Dugald makes a great point that not everyone's definition of green is the same and gives a good example. Funds have bee...

6 days 22 hours ago
Jasmin Jakupovic

How did they get the AFSL in the first place? Given the green light by ASIC. This is terrible example of ASIC's incompet...

1 week ago

AustralianSuper and Australian Retirement Trust have posted the financial results for the 2022–23 financial year for their combined 5.3 million members....

9 months 1 week ago

A $34 billion fund has come out on top with a 13.3 per cent return in the last 12 months, beating out mega funds like Australian Retirement Trust and Aware Super. ...

9 months ago

The verdict in the class action case against AMP Financial Planning has been delivered in the Federal Court by Justice Moshinsky....

9 months 1 week ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND