Negative gearing reforms to favour lower income investors

image
image
expand image

Negative gearing reforms can save the Australian Government more than $1.7 billion each year, a 57.3 per cent saving from the $3.04 billion cost of negative gearing deductions currently, without hurting lower income investors, Australian Housing and Urban Research Institute (AHURI) research confirms.

The AHURI report, Income tax treatment of housing assets: an assessment of proposed reform arrangement, looked at reforms to negative gearing and capital gains tax (CGT) that would reduce the impact on everyday ‘mum and dad’ investors.

Key findings of the report included:

  • Reforming rental deductions could provide greater tax concessions to ‘mum and dad’ investors and reduce the generous concessions that ‘sophisticated’ investors on higher income currently receive;
  • A reduction in CGT discount has the potential to reduce inequality; and
  • CGT reform could be gradual.

The research sought reforms that would have the least impact on investors with lower incomes, said author, Professor Alan Duncan, from the Bankwest Curtin Economics Centre at Curtin University.

“Current negative gearing policies are heavily skewed towards high income earners, raising concerns about the extent to which these policies exacerbate income and wealth inequality in Australia,” said Duncan. “Our modelling suggests that a progressive rental deduction for investors cushions less wealth ‘mum and dad’ investors from significant drops in tax savings, and may be an appropriate policy option.”

Co-author, Professor Rachel Ong ViforJ, said reductions in CGT discounts would mean high income investors pay more tax than lower income investors, but that the reform would be “progressive in nature, reducing negative gearing tax savings by greater margins as tax assessable income increases”.

ViforJ said the changes would have to be worded carefully to ensure high income investors understand that the tax amount would represent a lower proportion of their take home income, and avoid the misconception that changes would have a proportionate impact on rental investors’ net incomes.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

 

Recommended for you

 

MARKET INSIGHTS

sub-bg sidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

Squeaky'21

My view is that after 2026 there will be quite a bit less than 10,000 'advisers' (investment advisers) and less than 100...

1 week 1 day ago
Jason Warlond

Dugald makes a great point that not everyone's definition of green is the same and gives a good example. Funds have bee...

1 week 1 day ago
Jasmin Jakupovic

How did they get the AFSL in the first place? Given the green light by ASIC. This is terrible example of ASIC's incompet...

1 week 2 days ago

AustralianSuper and Australian Retirement Trust have posted the financial results for the 2022–23 financial year for their combined 5.3 million members....

9 months 2 weeks ago

A $34 billion fund has come out on top with a 13.3 per cent return in the last 12 months, beating out mega funds like Australian Retirement Trust and Aware Super. ...

9 months ago

The verdict in the class action case against AMP Financial Planning has been delivered in the Federal Court by Justice Moshinsky....

9 months 2 weeks ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND