Give us competition powers says ASIC
The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) is continuing to press the Parliament for it to be handed competition powers.
The regulator’s continuing campaign to be given competition powers has been evidenced by its new chairman, James Shipton, who has told the Senate Economics Legislation Committee “it is important ASIC has a proactive mandate to consider competition issues in making regulatory decisions”.
The handing of competition powers to ASIC has been supported by recent work undertaken by the Productivity Commission and has been canvassed as an additional means of helping it deal with the vertically-integrated activities of the major banks.
For his part, Shipton said that ASIC’s perspective on competition was to identify where consumer harm and poor conduct resulted from where competition was not operating effectively.
“Addressing these issues often requires a specific regulatory response, which requires consideration of competition issues,” he said.
“To the extent possible, ASIC has taken this kind of tailored approach to various competition problems in financial markets. Our work on add-on insurance sold through car yards is a good example,” Shipton said.
“However, to continue this approach, it is important ASIC has a proactive mandate to consider competition issues when making regulatory decisions,” he said.
Recommended for you
Government has introduced a bill to Parliament to legislate the first stream of the QAR reforms.
ASIC now has a 1:1 ratio when it comes to court success in the enforcement of crypto activities and more action is expected as Treasury seeks to introduce a regulatory framework.
A leading governance body has hit out at “specialist interest groups proposing ad hoc law reform” when it comes to reforms of financial services legislation and believes an independent body is needed.
The release of ALRC’s final report into financial services legislation has highlighted financial advice as a “significant” focus as it seeks to reduce costs and help advisers understand their obligations, alongside the Quality of Advice Review.
