ClearView’s direct life sales business takes regulatory hit

6 February 2018
| By Mike |
image
image
expand image

Publicly-listed life insurance and advice company, ClearView Life Assurance Limited (Clearview) will refund approximately $1.5 million to 16,000 consumers and has stopped selling life insurance direct to consumers.

The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) said the refund and action by ClearView had followed regulator concerns about its life insurance sales practices.

ASIC said a review of ClearView's sales calls found it used unfair and high pressure sales practices when selling consumers life insurance policies by phone and that these sales were made directly to consumers, without personal financial advice.

It said ASIC's review raised concerns that between 1 January 2014 and 30 June 2017, when selling over 32,000 life insurance policies direct to consumers, 1,166 of which were to consumers residing in high Indigenous populated areas who were unlikely to have English as their first language, ClearView sales staff:

  • made misleading statements about the cover, the premiums, and the effect of any of the consumer's pre-existing medical conditions
  • did not clearly obtain consumer consent to purchase the cover before processing the premium payments, and
  • used pressure sales tactics to sell the policies.

In response to ASIC's concerns, ClearView will:

  • refund full premiums, all bank fees and interest to customers with high initial lapse rates
  • refund 50 per cent of premiums and interest to customers with high ongoing lapse rates
  • offer a sales call review to other eligible consumers and remediate if there is evidence of poor conduct
  • engage an independent expert (EY) to provide independent assurance over the consumer remediation program; and
  • cease selling life insurance directly to consumers (that is, without personal financial advice).

ASIC Deputy Chair Peter Kell said that pressure sales tactics are unacceptable.

“Purchasing life insurance is a key financial decision for consumers, and all the information provided to them must be clear and balanced. Insurers should properly supervise their sales staff and ensure that no misconduct is occurring,” he said.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

 

Recommended for you

 

MARKET INSIGHTS

sub-bg sidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

Squeaky'21

My view is that after 2026 there will be quite a bit less than 10,000 'advisers' (investment advisers) and less than 100...

1 week ago
Jason Warlond

Dugald makes a great point that not everyone's definition of green is the same and gives a good example. Funds have bee...

1 week ago
Jasmin Jakupovic

How did they get the AFSL in the first place? Given the green light by ASIC. This is terrible example of ASIC's incompet...

1 week 1 day ago

AustralianSuper and Australian Retirement Trust have posted the financial results for the 2022–23 financial year for their combined 5.3 million members....

9 months 1 week ago

A $34 billion fund has come out on top with a 13.3 per cent return in the last 12 months, beating out mega funds like Australian Retirement Trust and Aware Super. ...

9 months ago

The verdict in the class action case against AMP Financial Planning has been delivered in the Federal Court by Justice Moshinsky....

9 months 2 weeks ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND