APRA cites group life/risk as ‘boiled frog’

14 November 2016
| By Mike |
image
image
expand image

The group life/risk sector has been cited by the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) as an example of an industry which in recent years was guilty of adopting higher risk business practices without necessarily considering the potential downside.

APRA chairman, Wayne Byers noted the citing of the group risk and mortgage lending standards in an APRA information intended to act as a cautionary note to the financial institutions overseen by the regulator.

Addressing an event in Melbourne, Byers pointed to the current low interest rate environment confronting institutions and said there was a danger of higher risk-taking as institutions felt under pressure to "search for yield".

"This pressure will likely grow the longer low rates persist. To date, we have not seen major shifts in asset portfolios designed to bolster returns by accepting materially greater risk. That doesn't mean that risk-seeking isn't happening at the margins however, and it is at the margins where we need to be most vigilant," he said.

"In my experience, rarely will an organisation consciously decide to ‘roll the dice' and significantly raise its risk profile in order to bolster profits. More likely, it happens over time in small incremental steps, and each individual step will not be seen to materially change the organisation's overall risk profile.

"Indeed, many may be seen as minor, operational decisions that do not even need the scrutiny of senior executives or boards — small tweaks to investment portfolios designed to chase a few extra basis points of yield, changes to product design that improve sales volumes by weakening terms and conditions, or shaving headcounts and investment budgets to save a few pennies of cost," Byers said.

However he said the collective impact of the decisions warranted attention.

"Like the anecdote about the frog in boiling water, there is a danger no one notices the ever-increasing risk profile until it is too late," Byers said.

"I doubt there are many organisations in the Australian financial sector that are not feeling the pressure from a low rate environment. As pressure is applied to find ways to improve returns, it is important that risk considerations remain front of mind. I'm sure we'd all like to avoid becoming boiled frogs!"

Read more about:

AUTHOR

 

Recommended for you

 

MARKET INSIGHTS

sub-bg sidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

Squeaky'21

My view is that after 2026 there will be quite a bit less than 10,000 'advisers' (investment advisers) and less than 100...

6 days 20 hours ago
Jason Warlond

Dugald makes a great point that not everyone's definition of green is the same and gives a good example. Funds have bee...

6 days 21 hours ago
Jasmin Jakupovic

How did they get the AFSL in the first place? Given the green light by ASIC. This is terrible example of ASIC's incompet...

1 week ago

AustralianSuper and Australian Retirement Trust have posted the financial results for the 2022–23 financial year for their combined 5.3 million members....

9 months 1 week ago

A $34 billion fund has come out on top with a 13.3 per cent return in the last 12 months, beating out mega funds like Australian Retirement Trust and Aware Super. ...

9 months ago

The verdict in the class action case against AMP Financial Planning has been delivered in the Federal Court by Justice Moshinsky....

9 months 1 week ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND