Insurers ignored regulator’s warnings on underwriting

3 November 2014
| By Jason |
image
image
expand image

Life insurers operating in the group risk area ignored warnings that price reductions and soft underwriting practices would affect profitability according to the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA).

In its annual report released on Friday APRA also claimed that while insurers have lifted premiums to recoup losses this move has created adverse outcomes for superannuation fund members and has not addressed the structural problems behind the situation.

APRA stated that group insurers had written record amounts of default cover without underwriting and had weakened underwriting controls on optional levels of cover while including automatic acceptance of incremental increases in cover without the need for medical tests.

APRA also stated that group insurers, having to work through more complex Total and Permanent Disability claims, had admitted claims that may not have been covered by policy wording while failing to develop pools of experienced claims staff capable of handling more complex claims.

The report stated the sector was also impacted by higher claims levels as superannuation fund members have become more aware of the cover available to them through their funds and as lawyers have become involved in insurance claims.

According to the report group insurers were faced with lower interest rates which led to lower investment income and an overall decline in life insurance industry profitability of 12 per cent for the year with APRA stating much of this was the result of poor claims handling and management at the group life level, particularly within industry superannuation fund schemes.

"Despite a number of warnings from APRA, group risk insurers have been slow to accept that significant price reductions combined with softer underwriting practices and enhancements to benefits would ultimately affect profitability," APRA stated.

"The immediate response of affected life insurers has been to lift premiums sharply to redress losses. Not only has this led to adverse outcomes for superannuation fund members, it does not address the structural problems that caused the situation."

Read more about:

AUTHOR

 

Recommended for you

 

MARKET INSIGHTS

sub-bg sidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

Avenue 17

I apologise, but, in my opinion, you are not right. I am assured. Let's discuss it. Write to me in PM, we will communica...

11 hours ago
Robert Segue

Sounds like a schoolyard childish scrap! take it behind the shelter sheds and sort it out! Really Publicly listed compa...

1 day 11 hours ago
JOHN GILLIES

iN THE END IT IS THE REGULATORS FAULT. wHILE I WAS WORKING I WAS ALLWAYS AMAZED AT HOW UNTHINKING SOME CLIENTS WERE! I...

1 day 15 hours ago

AustralianSuper and Australian Retirement Trust have posted the financial results for the 2022–23 financial year for their combined 5.3 million members....

9 months 2 weeks ago

A $34 billion fund has come out on top with a 13.3 per cent return in the last 12 months, beating out mega funds like Australian Retirement Trust and Aware Super. ...

9 months 1 week ago

The verdict in the class action case against AMP Financial Planning has been delivered in the Federal Court by Justice Moshinsky....

9 months 2 weeks ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND