Questions raised on ASIC's FOFA approach
The Federal Opposition is understood to be considering questions about why two former senior staffers from consumer group, Choice, are now playing a central role within the Australian Securities and Investments Commission's (ASIC's) development of the Future of Financial Advice (FOFA) regulations.
The Opposition is understood to have received expressions of concern from some people in the financial services industry that the two men - ASIC commissioner Peter Kell and ASIC general manager Nick Coates - have both worked for Choice, while Coates was also employed by Industry Funds Management.
Coates was working for the Australian Consumers Association (ACA) - now Choice - at the time ASIC imposed an enforceable undertaking on AMP in 2006 and was harshly critical of the commission-based remuneration system which prevailed at that time. He later worked for Industry Funds Management.
The ACA was part of a coalition of groups (which included the Industry Super Network) which prosecuted a strong lobbying approach in the lead-up to the Parliament's consideration and passage of the FOFA bills.
Both Kell and Coates participated in the recent Association of Financial Advisers (AFA) national roadshow, outlining ASIC's approach to the FOFA regulations. Kell has also provided background to ASIC's approach to other key industry events.
None of the major planning groups such as the AFA or the Financial Planning Association have raised issues about either Kell or Coates.
The Opposition has given no indication of whether it will pursue the ASIC approach via the committee processes when Parliament resumes later next month.
AUTHOR
Staff Writer
Recommended for you
Government has introduced a bill to Parliament to legislate the first stream of the QAR reforms.
ASIC now has a 1:1 ratio when it comes to court success in the enforcement of crypto activities and more action is expected as Treasury seeks to introduce a regulatory framework.
A leading governance body has hit out at “specialist interest groups proposing ad hoc law reform” when it comes to reforms of financial services legislation and believes an independent body is needed.
The release of ALRC’s final report into financial services legislation has highlighted financial advice as a “significant” focus as it seeks to reduce costs and help advisers understand their obligations, alongside the Quality of Advice Review.
