Material differences between FOFA policy and delivery

2 February 2012
| By Staff |
image
image
expand image

The Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia (ASFA) has pointed to the Future of Financial Advice (FOFA) process as containing "material differences between some policy announcements and the draft legislation".

In a submission filed with the Senate Economics Committee reviewing the bills, ASFA has supported the need for a transition period for implementing the legislation on the basis that "even at the best of times it is a considerable risk to authorise the expenditure of resources based on draft legislation".

"In the context of FOFA, where there have been material differences between some policy announcements and the draft legislation, it is even riskier," the submission said.

"Decision makers committing significant financial and other resources to implementing change of this complexity and scale deserve legislative certainty," it said.

ASFA pointed to the two-year transition period allowed with respect to the Financial Services Reform Act and the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act.

It said it would support the Australian Securities and Investments Commission's stated intention to adopt an approach of "facilitated implementation" during a transition period of 12 months from 1 July, this year.

Elsewhere in its submission, ASFA has backed other financial services industry players in calling for amendments to the legislation to enable financial advisers to deliver scaled advice.

It said the bill should be amended to enable the client and the financial adviser jointly to determine the subject matter of the advice.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

 

Recommended for you

 

MARKET INSIGHTS

sub-bg sidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

Squeaky'21

My view is that after 2026 there will be quite a bit less than 10,000 'advisers' (investment advisers) and less than 100...

1 week ago
Jason Warlond

Dugald makes a great point that not everyone's definition of green is the same and gives a good example. Funds have bee...

1 week ago
Jasmin Jakupovic

How did they get the AFSL in the first place? Given the green light by ASIC. This is terrible example of ASIC's incompet...

1 week 1 day ago

AustralianSuper and Australian Retirement Trust have posted the financial results for the 2022–23 financial year for their combined 5.3 million members....

9 months 1 week ago

A $34 billion fund has come out on top with a 13.3 per cent return in the last 12 months, beating out mega funds like Australian Retirement Trust and Aware Super. ...

9 months ago

The verdict in the class action case against AMP Financial Planning has been delivered in the Federal Court by Justice Moshinsky....

9 months 2 weeks ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND