FOFA rhetoric doesn't match strategy: AFA
The original intent of the Government’s Future of Financial Advice (FOFA) reforms was to create enhanced transparency and better outcomes for investors, but this rhetoric does not match the outlined strategy.
That is the main point flowing from the Association of Financial Advisers’ (AFA) updated FOFA member pack, launched by the chief executive officer Richard Klipin (pictured) and national president Brad Fox.
The AFA reiterated its convictions that the reforms package was against the interests of consumers, advisers, small businesses and communities in regional Australia.
“FOFA has failed to strike the right balance between improving advice outcomes on the one hand, whilst retaining access and affordability for all consumers on the other,” Klipin and Fox wrote in their address to members.
The FOFA member pack had outlined the main changes announced by the Financial Services Minister Bill Shorten last month, such as the ban on risk insurance commissions in superannuation, a two-year opt-in requirement and a ban on all volume payments/sales target payments to advisers and licensees.
The document had also made clear that the debate was still in full force, but had moved from policy to a political debate, encouraging advisers to write to their local members and lobby against the FOFA reforms package as it is currently presented.
The association stated that FOFA “adopts a paternalistic policy approach and signals a return to the ‘nanny state’, where the Government dictates terms of the adviser-client relationship.”
Klipin had called for the Government to undertake a modelling process that would identify the benefits and consequences of the proposed FOFA changes.
Recommended for you
Government has introduced a bill to Parliament to legislate the first stream of the QAR reforms.
ASIC now has a 1:1 ratio when it comes to court success in the enforcement of crypto activities and more action is expected as Treasury seeks to introduce a regulatory framework.
A leading governance body has hit out at “specialist interest groups proposing ad hoc law reform” when it comes to reforms of financial services legislation and believes an independent body is needed.
The release of ALRC’s final report into financial services legislation has highlighted financial advice as a “significant” focus as it seeks to reduce costs and help advisers understand their obligations, alongside the Quality of Advice Review.