Super performance tests increase the value of advice

4 November 2021
| By Liam Cormican |
image
image
expand image

The “blunt” nature of the superannuation performance test means the role of financial advisers in educating their clients is becoming more and more important, according to Vision Super.

Speaking at a FINSIA webinar, Emma Robertson, Vision Super head of investment operations, said her superfund had been conflicted by their continual repetition of the phrase “past performance is no guarantee of future performance” and a “blunt” performance test based entirely on past performance.

“So, we do need an education and advice piece around understanding how members can properly assess the capabilities of the funds and compare it,” said Robertson.

She said the superannuation industry needed education, robust and transparent data and independent advice.

But one of the challenges facing super at them moment, Robertson said, was that it was difficult to source “truly independent advice”.

Kristian Fok, CBUS Super chief investment officer, said the performance test had a ‘perverse’ effect in that it promoted short term decision making even though products were assessed over an eight-year time horizon.

“So, you can do the maths, and if you happen to have a really strong period that rolls off, you know what you have to achieve, for instance, if you're on the edge,” he said.

“I think if you've had consistent… performance year by year, and you've got a margin, then you're probably going to think about things a bit differently.

“So, you're going to have these sort of haves and have nots in terms of the ability to execute.”

Georgie Dudley, JANA head of business strategy and innovation, added that the need to hold the industry to account, highlighted by the performance test, should be balanced with the effect it had on members.

“One of the things that we do find a bit challenging with the framework is that it puts a lot of pressure back on a member to then try and look at ‘well is the forward-looking potential performance of a fund consistent with that historical analysis?’,” Dudley said.

“Ultimately past performance is no guide to future performance, we can all agree to that, but I think at the same time, we can’t completely throw that out the window in terms of saying we don’t care about performance because as an industry I think we have to hold ourselves to a higher bar.”

Read more about:

AUTHOR

 

Recommended for you

 

MARKET INSIGHTS

sub-bg sidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

Simon

Who get's the $10M? Where does the money go?? Might it end up in the CSLR to financially assist duped investors??? ...

3 days 23 hours ago
Squeaky'21

My view is that after 2026 there will be quite a bit less than 10,000 'advisers' (investment advisers) and less than 100...

1 week 4 days ago
Jason Warlond

Dugald makes a great point that not everyone's definition of green is the same and gives a good example. Funds have bee...

1 week 4 days ago

AustralianSuper and Australian Retirement Trust have posted the financial results for the 2022–23 financial year for their combined 5.3 million members....

9 months 2 weeks ago

A $34 billion fund has come out on top with a 13.3 per cent return in the last 12 months, beating out mega funds like Australian Retirement Trust and Aware Super. ...

9 months ago

The verdict in the class action case against AMP Financial Planning has been delivered in the Federal Court by Justice Moshinsky....

9 months 2 weeks ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND