SMSF Association dismisses ACTU claims

14 March 2019
| By Mike |
image
image
expand image

The SMSF Association has rejected a call by the Australian Council of Trade Unions (ACT) for a fresh inquiry into the self-managed super fund (SMSF) sector based on the recent Productivity Commission (PC) Review of Superannuation.

SMSF Association chief executive, John Maroney said the ACTU call was totally unwarranted.

His comments came at the same time as questions were asked at the Conference of Major Superannuation Funds on the Gold Coast questioned why SMSFs had been specifically excluded from the Royal Commission into Misconduct in the Banking, Superannuation and Financial Services Industry.

Maroney dismissed the ACTU’s calls saying it had been clearly demonstrated that the PC’s analysis showing SMSFs with less than $500,000 were underperforming the APRA-regulated funds had used highly questionable data about SMSF investment returns and costs, as well as poor methodology, to reach the conclusion.

“Certainly, there are more than enough question marks about the PC’s analysis to dismiss any call for another inquiry, especially when the PC, in its final report, said there should be no barriers to individuals setting up an SMSF and that these funds provided a ‘key source of choice’ in Australia’s increasingly concentrated superannuation sector,” he said.

“In addition, this type of simplistic analysis ignores the non-financial benefits that many SMSF members believe they can only achieve in overseeing their own fund, including greater control, flexibility and transparency.”

The ACTU assistant secretary, Scott Connolly, has claimed there should be consistent scrutiny of SMSFs who he claimed were not providing for their members”. 

Maroney said it was often forgotten by critics of the SMSF sector that it has had three reviews in the past decade with none of them recommending any significant restrictions or changes to SMSFs.

“The Cooper Review (2010), the Murray Inquiry (2014) and the PC (2018) have not recommended restrictions for SMSFs or tighter regulation of the sector.”

Although disagreeing with the call for another review, Maroney adds that the Association “strongly endorses” calls by the PC and ASIC for financial advisers to be required to have undertaken specialist SMSF education before being allowed to advise SMSF clients.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

 

Recommended for you

 

MARKET INSIGHTS

sub-bg sidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

Squeaky'21

My view is that after 2026 there will be quite a bit less than 10,000 'advisers' (investment advisers) and less than 100...

1 week ago
Jason Warlond

Dugald makes a great point that not everyone's definition of green is the same and gives a good example. Funds have bee...

1 week ago
Jasmin Jakupovic

How did they get the AFSL in the first place? Given the green light by ASIC. This is terrible example of ASIC's incompet...

1 week 1 day ago

AustralianSuper and Australian Retirement Trust have posted the financial results for the 2022–23 financial year for their combined 5.3 million members....

9 months 1 week ago

A $34 billion fund has come out on top with a 13.3 per cent return in the last 12 months, beating out mega funds like Australian Retirement Trust and Aware Super. ...

9 months ago

The verdict in the class action case against AMP Financial Planning has been delivered in the Federal Court by Justice Moshinsky....

9 months 2 weeks ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND